0144 Assessing and addressing non-response at follow-up in the gulf study. (21st August 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 0144 Assessing and addressing non-response at follow-up in the gulf study. (21st August 2017)
- Main Title:
- 0144 Assessing and addressing non-response at follow-up in the gulf study
- Authors:
- Strelitz, Jean
Keil, Alex
Richardson, David
Gammon, Marilie
Kwok, Richard
Sandler, Dale
Engel, Lawrence - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: The Gulf Long Term Follow-up (GuLF) STUDY is the first investigation to assess coronary heart disease (CHD) among oil spill workers. Participant non-response to periodic follow-up interviews can impact the ability to measure CHD over time. Describing predictors of non-response and the impact on analyses will improve generalizability of results to the study population. Objective: Assess predictors of non-response at the first follow-up interview in the GuLF STUDY and use inverse probability (IP) weights to account for these in an analysis of oil spill cleanup work duration and CHD. Methods: We examined covariate distributions between those who did (n=21, 245) and did not (n=10, 364) complete the follow-up interview, and constructed IP censoring weights to account for these differences. We applied the weights to estimate cohort-level hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for oil spill cleanup work duration and self-reported nonfatal CHD. Results: Those who participated in the follow-up interview were more likely to be older, have higher income and education, and were less likely to be smokers. After applying IP censoring weights and controlling for confounding, work duration (>180 days vs. 1–30 days) was non-significantly associated with nonfatal CHD [HR (95% CI)=1.50 (0.92–2.43)]. The results were similar without censoring weights [HR (95% CI)=1.41 (0.87–2.27)]. Conclusions: Several factors were associated with participation in theAbstract : Background: The Gulf Long Term Follow-up (GuLF) STUDY is the first investigation to assess coronary heart disease (CHD) among oil spill workers. Participant non-response to periodic follow-up interviews can impact the ability to measure CHD over time. Describing predictors of non-response and the impact on analyses will improve generalizability of results to the study population. Objective: Assess predictors of non-response at the first follow-up interview in the GuLF STUDY and use inverse probability (IP) weights to account for these in an analysis of oil spill cleanup work duration and CHD. Methods: We examined covariate distributions between those who did (n=21, 245) and did not (n=10, 364) complete the follow-up interview, and constructed IP censoring weights to account for these differences. We applied the weights to estimate cohort-level hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for oil spill cleanup work duration and self-reported nonfatal CHD. Results: Those who participated in the follow-up interview were more likely to be older, have higher income and education, and were less likely to be smokers. After applying IP censoring weights and controlling for confounding, work duration (>180 days vs. 1–30 days) was non-significantly associated with nonfatal CHD [HR (95% CI)=1.50 (0.92–2.43)]. The results were similar without censoring weights [HR (95% CI)=1.41 (0.87–2.27)]. Conclusions: Several factors were associated with participation in the GuLF STUDY follow-up interview, however results for work duration and CHD were robust to censoring. Weighting improved generalizability of results but did not change conclusions about the association between work duration and CHD. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Occupational and environmental medicine. Volume 74(2017)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Occupational and environmental medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 74(2017)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 74, Issue 1 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 74
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0074-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A42
- Page End:
- A42
- Publication Date:
- 2017-08-21
- Subjects:
- Medicine, Industrial -- Periodicals
Environmental health -- Periodicals
616.980305 - Journal URLs:
- http://oem.bmj.com/ ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/13510711.html ↗
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=172&action=archive ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/oemed-2017-104636.113 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1351-0711
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19210.xml