ALLOMETRIC SCALING OF VO2max: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Issue 22 (1st November 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- ALLOMETRIC SCALING OF VO2max: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Issue 22 (1st November 2016)
- Main Title:
- ALLOMETRIC SCALING OF VO2max: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
- Authors:
- Lolli, L
Batterham, AM
Weston, KL
Atkinson, G - Abstract:
- Abstract : We aimed to provide the first quantitative synthesis of derived static allometric coefficients ( b ) used for scaling maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max ) to whole-body mass and fat-free mass in human samples. Eight electronic databases were searched for relevant peer-reviewed articles. Inclusion criteria comprised human cardiorespiratory fitness data; cross-sectional study designs; an empirical derivation of the exponent; reported precision statistics; and reported information regarding participant sex, age and sports background, VO2max protocol, body composition protocol and line-fitting methods. Thirty-seven studies, involving 7, 851 participants, met the eligibility criteria and were dichotomized into two main domains relevant to whole-body mass (n=28) and fat-free mass (n=16), respectively. The pooled allometric exponent (95% CL) was found to be 0.71 (0.65 to 0.77) for body mass and 0.91 (0.83 to 0.98) for fat-free mass. The among-studies heterogeneity was substantial for both whole-body mass and fat-free mass (τ =±0.15). Participant sex explained 33% of the between-study variability in the whole body mass exponent, but only 5% of the variability in the fat-free mass exponent. While the body mass exponent was substantially lower in women ( b =0.52; 95% CL: 0.41 to 0.64) than for men ( b =0.77; 95% CL: 0.71 to 0.83), the fat-free mass exponent was similar for both sexes. None of the identified moderator variables was statistically significant. The body massAbstract : We aimed to provide the first quantitative synthesis of derived static allometric coefficients ( b ) used for scaling maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max ) to whole-body mass and fat-free mass in human samples. Eight electronic databases were searched for relevant peer-reviewed articles. Inclusion criteria comprised human cardiorespiratory fitness data; cross-sectional study designs; an empirical derivation of the exponent; reported precision statistics; and reported information regarding participant sex, age and sports background, VO2max protocol, body composition protocol and line-fitting methods. Thirty-seven studies, involving 7, 851 participants, met the eligibility criteria and were dichotomized into two main domains relevant to whole-body mass (n=28) and fat-free mass (n=16), respectively. The pooled allometric exponent (95% CL) was found to be 0.71 (0.65 to 0.77) for body mass and 0.91 (0.83 to 0.98) for fat-free mass. The among-studies heterogeneity was substantial for both whole-body mass and fat-free mass (τ =±0.15). Participant sex explained 33% of the between-study variability in the whole body mass exponent, but only 5% of the variability in the fat-free mass exponent. While the body mass exponent was substantially lower in women ( b =0.52; 95% CL: 0.41 to 0.64) than for men ( b =0.77; 95% CL: 0.71 to 0.83), the fat-free mass exponent was similar for both sexes. None of the identified moderator variables was statistically significant. The body mass exponent estimate encompassed both ⅔- and ¾-power laws. Conversely, the fat-free mass exponent was substantially larger and more generalisable due to the heterogeneity of body composition in human samples. We conclude that the scaling of VO2max in humans is consistent with the allometric cascade model, with an estimated pooled exponent that precludes ⅔- and ¾-power scaling. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- British journal of sports medicine. Volume 50:Issue 22(2016)
- Journal:
- British journal of sports medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 50:Issue 22(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 50, Issue 22 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 50
- Issue:
- 22
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0050-0022-0000
- Page Start:
- e4
- Page End:
- e4
- Publication Date:
- 2016-11-01
- Subjects:
- Sports medicine
Sports medicine -- Periodicals
617.1027 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bjsm.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096952.2 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0306-3674
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19187.xml