Cancer symptom scale preferences: does one size fit all?. Issue 2 (10th August 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Cancer symptom scale preferences: does one size fit all?. Issue 2 (10th August 2016)
- Main Title:
- Cancer symptom scale preferences: does one size fit all?
- Authors:
- Jeter, Kirby
Blackwell, Siobhan
Burke, Lucy
Joyce, David
Moran, Catherine
Conway, Emma Victoria
Cremen, Iseult
O'Connor, Brenda
Ui Dhuibhir, Pauline
Walsh, Declan - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: Patients with advanced cancer do not report all symptoms, so assessment is best done systematically. However, for such patients, completion rates of some symptom instruments are <50%. Symptoms can be quantified by various scales including the Categorical Response Scale (CRS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patient preferences for CRS, NRS and VAS in symptom assessment and their clinical utility in 3 cancer symptoms: pain, tiredness and appetite loss were determined. Methods: A prospective survey was conducted involving cancer admissions to a 36-bed palliative care unit. Results: 100 inpatients were recruited, aged 38–93 years (x̅ =71 years; SD=11.6), with median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 2 (range 0–4). VAS was the least preferred measure. 52% of patients choose the same scale for all 3 symptoms and 44% for 2, with 4% choosing a different individual scale per symptom. There was moderate agreement between participant scale preference and observer determined ease of scale completion (loss of appetite: κ=0.36; pain: κ=0.49; tiredness: κ=0.45). Participants preferred CRS for appetite loss (48%) and tiredness (40%) and NRS for pain (44%). Conclusions: VAS was the least favoured scale and should be used cautiously in this population. Most participants had a scale preference with high intrapatient consistency between scales. CRS was preferred for appetite loss and tiredness and NRS for pain.Abstract : Objectives: Patients with advanced cancer do not report all symptoms, so assessment is best done systematically. However, for such patients, completion rates of some symptom instruments are <50%. Symptoms can be quantified by various scales including the Categorical Response Scale (CRS), Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patient preferences for CRS, NRS and VAS in symptom assessment and their clinical utility in 3 cancer symptoms: pain, tiredness and appetite loss were determined. Methods: A prospective survey was conducted involving cancer admissions to a 36-bed palliative care unit. Results: 100 inpatients were recruited, aged 38–93 years (x̅ =71 years; SD=11.6), with median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 2 (range 0–4). VAS was the least preferred measure. 52% of patients choose the same scale for all 3 symptoms and 44% for 2, with 4% choosing a different individual scale per symptom. There was moderate agreement between participant scale preference and observer determined ease of scale completion (loss of appetite: κ=0.36; pain: κ=0.49; tiredness: κ=0.45). Participants preferred CRS for appetite loss (48%) and tiredness (40%) and NRS for pain (44%). Conclusions: VAS was the least favoured scale and should be used cautiously in this population. Most participants had a scale preference with high intrapatient consistency between scales. CRS was preferred for appetite loss and tiredness and NRS for pain. Consideration should be given to individualised cancer symptom assessment according to patient scale preference. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ supportive & palliative care. Volume 8:Issue 2(2018)
- Journal:
- BMJ supportive & palliative care
- Issue:
- Volume 8:Issue 2(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0008-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 198
- Page End:
- 203
- Publication Date:
- 2016-08-10
- Subjects:
- Cancer -- Hospice care -- Symptoms and symptom management
Palliative treatment -- Periodicals
Terminal care -- Periodicals
616.029 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://spcare.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001018 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2045-435X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19187.xml