P-231 What happens when a bishop, an OT & the MD of a department store are involved in rebranding a hospice?. Issue Volume 8: Issue (2018)Supplement 2 (November 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- P-231 What happens when a bishop, an OT & the MD of a department store are involved in rebranding a hospice?. Issue Volume 8: Issue (2018)Supplement 2 (November 2018)
- Main Title:
- P-231 What happens when a bishop, an OT & the MD of a department store are involved in rebranding a hospice?
- Authors:
- Hyde, Fran
Jarman-Howe, Mark - Abstract:
- Abstract : Branding for hospices was recently described as a 'hot topic' (Hospice UK, 2018) in an increasingly fast-paced as well as competitive environment for hospices and at a time when organisations are placing greater emphasis on brands to differentiate (Lee & Bourne, 2017; Chapleo, 2015; Stride & Lee, 2007; Lee, 2013). Balancing normative (social/mission driven) and utilitarian (business driven) identities (Lee & Bourne, 2017) hospice brands need to encapsulate a mission and represent a set of values (Stride & Lee, 2007; Kylnader & Sytone, 2012; Lee 2013) about a form of end of life care which they consider non-negotiable. Furthermore, a hospice brand is inherently complex needing to generate trust, foster a sense of pride amongst staff, volunteers and fundraisers, however, carrying out this work can draw accusations of inappropriate business-like behaviour by critics who perceive such use of resources unnecessary (Lee & Bourne, 2017; Kylnader & Sytone, 2012). Whilst several hospices have undertaken branding work (Design Week, 2017) this paper addresses the paucity of studies which consider the particular challenges of undertaking this work at hospices. Outlining an eight-month project at St Helena Hospice and disseminating key insights gained from participant observation, this paper builds on a body of work which considers the specific tensions and reactions which emerge when working with an established brand in the not-for-profit sector (Lee, 2013) and, furthermore,Abstract : Branding for hospices was recently described as a 'hot topic' (Hospice UK, 2018) in an increasingly fast-paced as well as competitive environment for hospices and at a time when organisations are placing greater emphasis on brands to differentiate (Lee & Bourne, 2017; Chapleo, 2015; Stride & Lee, 2007; Lee, 2013). Balancing normative (social/mission driven) and utilitarian (business driven) identities (Lee & Bourne, 2017) hospice brands need to encapsulate a mission and represent a set of values (Stride & Lee, 2007; Kylnader & Sytone, 2012; Lee 2013) about a form of end of life care which they consider non-negotiable. Furthermore, a hospice brand is inherently complex needing to generate trust, foster a sense of pride amongst staff, volunteers and fundraisers, however, carrying out this work can draw accusations of inappropriate business-like behaviour by critics who perceive such use of resources unnecessary (Lee & Bourne, 2017; Kylnader & Sytone, 2012). Whilst several hospices have undertaken branding work (Design Week, 2017) this paper addresses the paucity of studies which consider the particular challenges of undertaking this work at hospices. Outlining an eight-month project at St Helena Hospice and disseminating key insights gained from participant observation, this paper builds on a body of work which considers the specific tensions and reactions which emerge when working with an established brand in the not-for-profit sector (Lee, 2013) and, furthermore, how such a project became an opportunity to inform and re-educate stakeholders. Accordingly, this paper has relevance for a range of stakeholders including trustees and senior leaders showing the 'doing of rebranding' focusing on how St Helena Hospice incorporated and integrated its philosophical foundations with the values and emotions of numerous, diverse stakeholders. Facilitating conversations this project broadened ambitions, implemented a new vision and re-evaluated key priorities repositioning St Helena Hospice (Lucarelli & Hallin, 2015). … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ supportive & palliative care. Volume 8: Issue (2018)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- BMJ supportive & palliative care
- Issue:
- Volume 8: Issue (2018)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 2 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0008-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- A92
- Page End:
- A92
- Publication Date:
- 2018-11
- Subjects:
- Palliative treatment -- Periodicals
Terminal care -- Periodicals
616.029 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://spcare.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-hospiceabs.256 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2045-435X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19189.xml