Method to measure the mismatch between target and achieved received dose intensity of chemotherapy in cancer trials: a retrospective analysis of the MRC BO06 trial in osteosarcoma. Issue 5 (30th May 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Method to measure the mismatch between target and achieved received dose intensity of chemotherapy in cancer trials: a retrospective analysis of the MRC BO06 trial in osteosarcoma. Issue 5 (30th May 2019)
- Main Title:
- Method to measure the mismatch between target and achieved received dose intensity of chemotherapy in cancer trials: a retrospective analysis of the MRC BO06 trial in osteosarcoma
- Authors:
- Lancia, Carlo
Anninga, Jakob
Spitoni, Cristian
Sydes, Matthew R.
Whelan, Jeremy
Hogendoorn, Pancras C W
Gelderblom, Hans
Fiocco, Marta - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: In cancer studies, the target received dose intensity (tRDI) for any regimen, the intended dose and time for the regimen, is commonly taken as a proxy for achieved RDI (aRDI), the actual individual dose and time for the regimen. Evaluating tRDI/aRDI mismatches is crucial to assess study results whenever patients are stratified on allocated regimen. The manuscript develops a novel methodology to highlight and evaluate tRDI/aRDI mismatches. Design: Retrospective analysis of a randomised controlled trial, MRC BO06 (EORTC 80931). Setting: Population-based study but proposed methodology can be applied to other trial designs. Participants: A total of 497 patients with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma, of which 19 were excluded because chemotherapy was not started or the estimated dose was abnormally high (>1.25 × prescribed dose). Intervention(s): Two regimens with the same anticipated cumulative dose (doxorubicin 6×75 mg/m 2 /week; cisplatin 6×100 mg/m 2 /week) over different time schedules: every 3 weeks in regimen-C and every 2 weeks in regimen-DI. Primary and secondary outcome measures: tRDI distribution was measured across groups of patients derived from k-means clustering of treatment data. K-means creates groups of patients who are aRDI-homogeneous. The main outcome is the proportion of tRDI values in groups of homogeneous aRDI. Results: For nearly half of the patients, there is a mismatch between tRDI and aRDI; for 21%, aRDI was closer to the tRDIAbstract : Objectives: In cancer studies, the target received dose intensity (tRDI) for any regimen, the intended dose and time for the regimen, is commonly taken as a proxy for achieved RDI (aRDI), the actual individual dose and time for the regimen. Evaluating tRDI/aRDI mismatches is crucial to assess study results whenever patients are stratified on allocated regimen. The manuscript develops a novel methodology to highlight and evaluate tRDI/aRDI mismatches. Design: Retrospective analysis of a randomised controlled trial, MRC BO06 (EORTC 80931). Setting: Population-based study but proposed methodology can be applied to other trial designs. Participants: A total of 497 patients with resectable high-grade osteosarcoma, of which 19 were excluded because chemotherapy was not started or the estimated dose was abnormally high (>1.25 × prescribed dose). Intervention(s): Two regimens with the same anticipated cumulative dose (doxorubicin 6×75 mg/m 2 /week; cisplatin 6×100 mg/m 2 /week) over different time schedules: every 3 weeks in regimen-C and every 2 weeks in regimen-DI. Primary and secondary outcome measures: tRDI distribution was measured across groups of patients derived from k-means clustering of treatment data. K-means creates groups of patients who are aRDI-homogeneous. The main outcome is the proportion of tRDI values in groups of homogeneous aRDI. Results: For nearly half of the patients, there is a mismatch between tRDI and aRDI; for 21%, aRDI was closer to the tRDI of the other regimen. Conclusions: For MRC BO06, tRDI did not predict well aRDI. The manuscript offers an original procedure to highlight the presence of and quantify tRDI/aRDI mismatches. Caution is required to interpret the effect of chemotherapy-regimen intensification on survival outcome at an individual level where such a mismatch is present. The study relevance lies in the use of individual realisation of the intended treatment, which depends on individual delays and/or dose reductions reported throughout the treatment. Trial registration number: ISRCTN86294690 . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open. Volume 9:Issue 5(2019)
- Journal:
- BMJ open
- Issue:
- Volume 9:Issue 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 9, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 9
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0009-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-05-30
- Subjects:
- received dose intensity -- osteosarcoma -- chemotherapy
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
610.72 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopen.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022980 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-6055
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19162.xml