Factors Behind Decline of Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation to Support Neonatal Respiratory Failure. Issue 8 (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lillie, Jon; Boot, Liz; Speggiorin, Simone; Nyman, Andrew G.
• Is Part Of: Pediatric critical care medicine. Volume 21:Issue 8(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: cannula -- extracorporeal membrane oxygenation/adverse effects -- neonate -- respiratory failure -- venovenous; Pediatric intensive care -- Periodicals; Pediatric emergencies -- Periodicals; 618.05
• DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002340
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1529-7535

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Neonates with respiratory failure are ideally supported with venovenous rather than venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation due to the reduced rate of neurologic complications. However, the proportion of neonates supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is declining. We aimed to explore the factors behind this decline. Design: We conducted a survey in order to understand current practice across the United Kingdom, exploring barriers to neonatal venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in addition to collecting U.K.-wide retrospective data from 2000 onwards. Patients: Neonates with respiratory failure supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the United Kingdom. Setting: All 11 pediatric U.K. extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers provided data. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: The percentage of neonates with respiratory failure supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation has declined from 58% to 16% over the last decade, reflected internationally with a decrease of 1.3% per year. Nine extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers are able to offer pediatric venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, but only four offer neonatal venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Of those able to provide neonatal venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, three centers use dual lumen cannulae and one uses neonatal multisite cannulation. The most frequently cited barriers to neonatal venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were the lack of availability of a suitable dual lumen cannula with concerns of cardiac perforation and challenges of multisite cannulation due to small caliber femoral veins. Conclusions: The majority of U.K. centers are unable to provide venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for neonates due to concerns with availability and suitability of dual lumen cannulae. An alternative to be considered is the use of multisite cannulation, which has been used historically and is currently being used in centers internationally and in the United Kingdom. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.