Evaluation of an Emergency Department and Hospital-Based Data Exchange to Improve HIV Care Engagement and Viral Suppression. Issue 8 (August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Avoundjian, Tigran; Golden, Matthew R.; Ramchandani, Meena S.; Guthrie, Brandon L.; Hughes, James P.; Baseman, Janet G.; Dombrowski, Julia C.
• Is Part Of: Sexually transmitted diseases. Volume 47:Issue 8(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-08
• Subjects: Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals; Sexual health -- Periodicals; 616.951005
• DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001195
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0148-5717

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Emergency department (ED) visits and inpatient (IP) admissions may provide an opportunity to reengage poorly engaged people living with HIV and facilitate viral suppression. In 2015, Public Health Seattle and King County partnered with the University of Washington Medicine to implement a real-time data exchange to identify virally unsuppressed people living with HIV seen at the ED/IP hospital and reengage them in HIV care. We evaluated the impact of the data exchange on care engagement and viral suppression. Methods: Public Health Seattle and King County received a text alert on weekdays 8 AM to 6 PM for ED/IP patients previously diagnosed with HIV with a most recent viral load ≥200 copies/mL. We compared viral load testing <3 months and viral suppression <6 months after an alert-eligible visit in the 2 years after intervention and the 7 to 30 months before intervention. To account for secular trends, we used difference-in-differences models to compare patients with alert-window visits to patients with visits outside the alert window before and after intervention. Results: Patients with visits within the alert window in the postintervention period were 1.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97–1.20) times more likely to have a viral load test within 3 months after an ED visit/IP admission and 1.50 (95% CI, 1.27–1.76) times more likely to achieve viral suppression within 6 months than patients in the preintervention period. However, care engagement (difference-in-differences relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.84–1.18) and viral suppression (difference-in-differences relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.84–1.20) trends were similar among patients with visits outside the alert window. Conclusions: Real-time data exchange with ED/IP hospitals was associated with improved viral suppression, but not increased care engagement. However, our results may reflect secular trends resulting from diverse interventions, of which ours was only one. More efforts are needed to improve the effectiveness of relinkage interventions guided by real-time data exchange. Abstract : Real-time data exchange between health department HIV programs and emergency departments can identify HIV care reengagement opportunities, but did not have a discernible independent effect beyond contemporaneous interventions to increase care engagement.