How employees perceive organizational learning: construct validation of the 25-item short form of the strategic learning assessment map (SF-SLAM). Issue 1 (8th January 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mainert, Jakob; Niepel, Christoph; Lans, Thomas; Greiff, Samuel
• Is Part Of: Journal of knowledge management. Volume 22:Issue 1(2018)
• Page Start: 57
• Page End: 75
• Publication Date: 2018-01-08
• Subjects: Organizational learning -- Ambidexterity -- Construct validation -- Short-form questionnaire -- Strategic learning assessment map (SLAM); Knowledge management -- Periodicals; 658.4
• DOI: 10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0494
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1367-3270

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: This study aims at the employees' view on organizational learning (OL). OL is originally assessed in the Strategic Learning Assessment Map (SLAM) at the level of the firm by addressing managers, who rated OL in the SLAM on five dimensions of individual, group, organizational, feed-forward and feedback learning. However, as employees are getting their jobs done discretely and are increasingly making their own decisions, their perspective on OL genuinely matters. Hence, the authors assessed OL at the level of the individual by addressing employees on all levels, who rated OL in a short form of the SLAM (SF-SLAM). Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, the authors focused on the construct validity of this SF-SLAM by investigating its reliability, factorial validity and nomological network. First, they asked whether the SF-SLAM reliably measures OL on five dimensions of individual, group, organizational, feed-forward and feedback learning. Next, they asked whether the SF-SLAM was associated with its nomological network of engaging in innovation-related learning activities, behaving innovatively on the job and showing higher educational levels, intelligence and individual job performances. They used a diverse German employee sample of skilled and unskilled workers and managers ( N = 434) and analyzed the data with structural equation modeling. Findings: The SF-SLAM was reliable, but revealed both constrained factorial validity and validity on the basis of its nomological network. First, five dimensions found support in the employee sample, but their correlations were high or very high, except for individual learning. Second, the SF-SLAM showed only few differential relations with variables from its nomological network. Originality/value: Taken together, the SF-SLAM is short, reliable and only valid for examining individual learning.