A cut‐off value for systemic immune‐inflammation index in the prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes in preterm premature rupture of the membranes. Issue 8 (1st June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tanacan, Atakan; Uyanik, Esra; Unal, Canan; Beksac, Mehmet Sinan
• Is Part Of: Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. Volume 46:Issue 8(2020)
• Page Start: 1333
• Page End: 1341
• Publication Date: 2020-06-01
• Subjects: neonatal complications -- obstetric outcomes -- pregnancy -- preterm premature rupture of the membranes -- systemic immune‐inflammation index; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; 618.1005
• DOI: 10.1111/jog.14320
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1341-8076

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To determine a cut‐off value for systemic immune‐inflammation index (SII)(neutrophil × platelet /lymphocyte) in the prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes in preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM). Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among singleton pregnancies with PPROM. Cases were divided into two main groups: Group 1) PPROM diagnosed at 24th–28th weeks of gestation and Group 2) PPROM diagnosed at >28th–34th weeks of gestation. Thereafter, main study groups were divided into two subgroups: Subgroup A: pregnancies with favorable neonatal outcomes and Subgroup B: pregnancies with composite adverse neonatal outcomes. Subgroups were compared in terms of demographic features, clinical characteristics, laboratory test results and SII values. Furthermore, cut‐off values of SII for the prediction of composite adverse neonatal outcomes were determined for two main groups. A Mann–Whitney U test was conducted to compare the median values and the chi‐square test was used to compare categorical variables among the groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the performance of SII value in predicting composite adverse neonatal outcomes. Results: Significant differences were observed for median platelet and SII values between the subgroups ( P < 0.001 for both in group 1 and P = 0.002 and P = 0.005, respectively, in group 2). Cut‐off values of 1695.14 10 9 /L (83.3% sensitivity, 85.7% specificity) and 1430.90 × 10 9 /L (71.4% sensitivity, 75.7% specificity) for composite adverse neonatal outcomes were determined, respectively in group 1 and 2 according to the ROC curve analysis. Conclusion: SII may be used as an additional indicator for the prediction of adverse neonatal outcomes in PPROM.