Comparison of alfalfa mixed with tall fescue and bermudagrass on forage accumulation, botanical composition, and nutritive value. Issue 5 (4th August 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of alfalfa mixed with tall fescue and bermudagrass on forage accumulation, botanical composition, and nutritive value. Issue 5 (4th August 2021)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of alfalfa mixed with tall fescue and bermudagrass on forage accumulation, botanical composition, and nutritive value
- Authors:
- Quinby, Marcia P.
Nave, Renata L. G.
Sulc, R. Mark
Castillo, Miguel S.
Bates, Gary E.
Schneider, Liesel G.
McIntosh, David W. - Abstract:
- Abstract: In order to utilize alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.), alone or in mixtures with grasses, defoliation management practices must be evaluated to assess their performance. The objective was to determine the forage accumulation (FA) and nutritive value of alfalfa grown as a monoculture (ALF) and in mixtures with tall fescue [ Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) Darbyish] (ATF) or bermudagrass [ Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers] (ABG) subjected to four harvest intervals (clipped every 21, 28, 35, and 42 d). The study was conducted in Crossville, TN, and Charleston, OH, during the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons, and in Salisbury, NC, during the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons. Harvest intervals of 35 d or greater showed optimal FA, with greatest productivity in spring. In summer, the plot productivity of ATF was not different from ABG. The ATF mixture was superior to ABG in FA for the entire season. Although tall fescue can be very competitive with alfalfa in mixtures, it results in greater FA while reducing weed competition. Botanical composition indicated greater weed infestation in ALF than in mixtures. Growing alfalfa–grass mixtures can increase sward crude protein compared with grass monocultures (average of 128 g kg –1 for ATF and 161 g kg –1 for ABG). We conclude that harvest intervals of 35 d or longer should be adopted to provide greater FA, and the ALF and ATF treatments resulted in superior FA compared with ABG in the southern United States. Core Ideas: Alfalfa alone does notAbstract: In order to utilize alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.), alone or in mixtures with grasses, defoliation management practices must be evaluated to assess their performance. The objective was to determine the forage accumulation (FA) and nutritive value of alfalfa grown as a monoculture (ALF) and in mixtures with tall fescue [ Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) Darbyish] (ATF) or bermudagrass [ Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers] (ABG) subjected to four harvest intervals (clipped every 21, 28, 35, and 42 d). The study was conducted in Crossville, TN, and Charleston, OH, during the 2016 and 2017 growing seasons, and in Salisbury, NC, during the 2017 and 2018 growing seasons. Harvest intervals of 35 d or greater showed optimal FA, with greatest productivity in spring. In summer, the plot productivity of ATF was not different from ABG. The ATF mixture was superior to ABG in FA for the entire season. Although tall fescue can be very competitive with alfalfa in mixtures, it results in greater FA while reducing weed competition. Botanical composition indicated greater weed infestation in ALF than in mixtures. Growing alfalfa–grass mixtures can increase sward crude protein compared with grass monocultures (average of 128 g kg –1 for ATF and 161 g kg –1 for ABG). We conclude that harvest intervals of 35 d or longer should be adopted to provide greater FA, and the ALF and ATF treatments resulted in superior FA compared with ABG in the southern United States. Core Ideas: Alfalfa alone does not control the weed population as effectively as in tall fescue mixtures. Harvest intervals above 35 d allow better forage accumulation and nutritive value. Alfalfa mixed in tall fescue has greater accumulation and nutritive value than in bermudagrass. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Crop science. Volume 61:Issue 5(2021)
- Journal:
- Crop science
- Issue:
- Volume 61:Issue 5(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 61, Issue 5 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 61
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0061-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 3746
- Page End:
- 3774
- Publication Date:
- 2021-08-04
- Subjects:
- Crop science -- Periodicals
Cultures -- Périodiques
Cultures de plein champ -- Périodiques
Crop science
Nutzpflanzen
Zeitschrift
Pflanzenbau
Periodicals
633 - Journal URLs:
- http://catalog.hathitrust.org/api/volumes/oclc/1565498.html ↗
https://search.proquest.com/publication/30013 ↗
http://crop.scijournals.org/ ↗
http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/10088/index.htm ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/csc2.20461 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0011-183X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19112.xml