Flows, leaks and blockages in informational interventions: A field experimental study of Bangalore's water sector. (June 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kumar, Tanu; Post, Alison E.; Ray, Isha
• Is Part Of: World development. Volume 106(2018)
• Page Start: 149
• Page End: 160
• Publication Date: 2018-06
• Subjects: Information -- Intermittent water supply -- Transparency -- Frontline worker -- Stress -- India; Economic history -- 1990- -- Periodicals; Economic assistance -- Developing countries -- Periodicals; 330.9
• DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.01.022
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0305-750X

Abstract

Highlights: We introduce a framework for analyzing the information production and dissemination process in informational interventions. We apply our framework to a program providing SMS notifications prior to water arrival in Bangalore, India. We detect no program impact on household welfare or state-citizen relations, and modest reductions in water-related stress. Our framework reveals that frontline worker noncompliance and asymmetric gender relations reduced information flows. Such frameworks should be used more extensively in development research to understand program success and failure. Abstract: Many policies and programs based on informational interventions hinge upon the assumption that providing citizens with information can help improve the quality of public services, or help citizens cope with poor services. We present a causal framework that can be used to identify leaks and blockages in the information production and dissemination process in such programs. We conceptualize the "information pipeline" as a series of connected nodes, each of which constitutes a possible point of blockage. We apply the framework to a field-experimental evaluation of a program that provided households in Bangalore, India, with advance notification of intermittently provided piped water. Our study detected no impacts on household wait times for water or on how citizens viewed the state, but found that notifications reduced stress. Our framework reveals that, in our case, noncompliance among human intermediaries and asymmetric gender relations contributed in large part to these null-to-modest results. Diagnostic frameworks like this should be used more extensively in development research to better understand the mechanisms responsible for program success and failure, to identify subgroups that actually received the intended treatment, and to identify potential leaks and blockages when replicating existing programs in new settings.