Ignoring floor and ceiling effects may underestimate the effect of carotid artery stenting on cognitive performance. (10th June 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Scherr, Martin; Kunz, Alexander; Doll, Anselm; Mutzenbach, Johannes Sebastian; Broussalis, Erasmia; Bergmann, Hans Jürgen; Kirschner, Margarita; Trinka, Eugen; Killer-Oberpfalzer, Monika
• Is Part Of: Journal of neurointerventional surgery. Volume 8:Number 7(2016)
• Page Start: 747
• Page End: 751
• Publication Date: 2015-06-10
• Subjects: Angiography -- Atherosclerosis; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Cerebrovascular disease -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.48
• DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011612
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1759-8478

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Data on neuropsychological outcome after carotid artery stenting (CAS) remain inconsistent, furthermore cognitive outcome seems to be unpredictable in the individual case. Previous studies reporting improvement or decline might be due to ceiling and floor effects of the applied cognitive tests. We applied cognitive testing before and after CAS, avoiding the pitfall of ceiling and floor effects. Methods: In our prospective database, we identified 72 patients free of clinical stroke with ≥70% carotid artery stenosis, who were treated with CAS. They were administered a neurocognitive test battery before and 3 months after CAS to compare cognitive performance before and after CAS. To avoid ceiling and floor effects of test performances, we additionally analysed subgroups of patients without baseline floor and ceiling cognitive performance. Results: Pre-interventional to post-interventional cognitive performance improved significantly in the subtests measuring verbal episodic memory; deterioration was observed in spatial memory. The subgroups of patients without baseline floor and ceiling cognitive performance improved in measures of global cognition, verbal episodic memory (patients with left-sided CAS) and divided attention (patients with right-sided CAS); we observed no significant effects in the other domains. Conclusions: Ignoring floor and ceiling effects may underestimate the impact of CAS on cognitive performance.