Effect of segmentation error correction on optical coherence tomography angiography measurements in healthy subjects and diabetic macular oedema. Issue 2 (29th April 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ghasemi Falavarjani, Khalil; Habibi, Abbas; Anvari, Pasha; Ghasemizadeh, Shahriar; Ashraf Khorasani, Maryam; Shenazandi, Hamideh; Sarraf, David
• Is Part Of: British journal of ophthalmology. Volume 104:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 162
• Page End: 166
• Publication Date: 2019-04-29
• Subjects: artifact -- diabetic retinopathy -- diabetic macular edema -- optical coherence tomography angiography -- segmentation error; Ophthalmology -- Periodicals; 617.7
• DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314018
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0007-1161

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: To evaluate the impact of segmentation error on vessel density measurements in healthy eyes and eyes with diabetic macular oedema (DMO). Methods: In this prospective, comparative, non-interventional study, enface optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images of the macula from healthy eyes and eyes with DMO were acquired. Two expert graders assessed and corrected the segmentation error. The rate of segmentation error and the changes in vessel density and inner retinal thickness after correction of the segmentation error were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results: 20 eyes with DMO and 24 healthy eyes were evaluated. Intergrader agreement was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient ≥0.9) for all parameters in both groups. The rate of segmentation error was 33% and 100% in healthy and diabetic eyes, respectively (p<0.001). Nine healthy eyes (37.5%) and all eyes with DMO (100%) were noted to exhibit a change in at least one of the foveal or parafoveal vessel density measurements. The rate of any change in foveal and parafoveal vessel densities in both the superficial and deep capillary plexus was statistically significantly higher in the diabetic group (all p<0.001). No statistically significant change was observed in mean vessel density (superficial and deep capillary plexuses) after correction of the segmentation error in healthy and DMO eyes (All p>0.05). However, the mean absolute change in the vessel density measurements was statistically significantly higher in the diabetic group (all p<0.05). The mean absolute change in superficial and deep inner retinal thickness was statistically significantly higher in DMO (p=0.02 and p=0.002, respectively). Conclusions: In this study, misidentification of retinal layers and consequent vessel density measurement error occurred in all eyes with DMO and in one-third of healthy eyes. The segmentation error should be checked and manually corrected in the OCTA vessel density measurements, especially in the presence of macular oedema.