From framework to boundary object? Reviewing gaps and critical trends in global energy justice research. (September 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Iwińska, Katarzyna; Lis, Aleksandra; Mączka, Krzysztof
• Is Part Of: Energy research & social science. Volume 79(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-09
• Subjects: Energy justice -- Literature review -- Boundary concepts -- Boundary objects -- VOS viewer -- Energy transition; Power resources -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Energy consumption -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; 333.7905
• DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2021.102191
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2214-6296

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: The concept of EJ has been evolving towards public policy and research networks. The EJ research mapping shows its vast growth in the countries of "Global North". "Global South" in EJ research is referring mostly to renewable energy transitions. EJ is a broad framework used in interdisciplinary analyses of energy transitions. EJ directs beyond academia, and it progresses as a boundary object. Abstract: The concept of energy justice (EJ) has gained importance in discussions about energy transitions, mainly due to a growing number of researchers working on the social implications of greenhouse gas emission reductions. At the moment, EJ is defined as a framework for discussing fairness in energy systems and operates as an umbrella term to signify various concerns related to energy development across diverse groups to enable communication. Thus, we call EJ a boundary object (BO) and discuss its further evolution into a standard, or its dissolution into several locally specific concepts. This study provides a systematic review of the literature that applies the concept of EJ: how its features developed and how it gained popularity in academic publications to mid-2019. We present a bibliometric overview of the number of occurrences of the concept across the literature using the Scopus and WOS databases (N = 182) and, using VOSviewer software, we describe similarities between research topics to which the concept was related. By mapping out its diverse thematic and geographic applications, we review the critical trends and claim that EJ can address real-life challenges. We submit that it will have more practical power once it starts being used more broadly to build cooperation among scholars, policymakers, activists, and grassroots movements.