O-120 White paper defining optimal advance care planning. (1st September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rietjens, Judith AC; Korfage, IJ; Janssen, Daisy JA; Jox, Ralf J; Drickamer, M; Seymour, Jane; Sudore, Rebecca L
• Is Part Of: BMJ supportive & palliative care. Volume 5(2015)Supplement 2
• Page Start: A41
• Page End: A41
• Publication Date: 2015-09-01
• Subjects: Palliative treatment -- Periodicals; Terminal care -- Periodicals; 616.029
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000978.126
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-435X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: There is a lack of consensus regarding the definition of advance care planning (ACP), the people for whom it is most beneficial, how and by whom it should be conducted, its integration in health care, and what appropriate outcomes measures are. Further, there are considerable differences worldwide in the willingness of health care providers, patients and relatives to discuss issues related to disease progression and end-of-life care, and the integration of these discussions in the health care system. Aim: To draft a white paper about ACP that is based on scientific evidence and transcultural consensus building that describes a common understanding of the definition the key elements of ACP. This white paper is commissioned by the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC). Methods and expected results: A three-round Delphi study will be conducted by a core group of 14 experts from 8 countries. The first round took place in June 2014 in a 2-day expert meeting. Five core domains were established: concept, content, system, measurements, and challenges/concerns. Subsequently, based on literature, a set of 50 recommendations related to these domains were drafted. These will be assessed in two rounds on its importance by a multidisciplinary expert panel (n = 100 from 16 countries). In addition, a research agenda for future ACP research will be constructed. Conclusion: The ACP white paper will provide a comprehensive overview of ACP based on evidence and consensus. It can serve as a framework for clinical practice, policy and research.