O25 Efficacy of anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): patient subgroup analysis of BICLA response in 2 phase 3 trials. (23rd March 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- O25 Efficacy of anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): patient subgroup analysis of BICLA response in 2 phase 3 trials. (23rd March 2020)
- Main Title:
- O25 Efficacy of anifrolumab in active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): patient subgroup analysis of BICLA response in 2 phase 3 trials
- Authors:
- Morand, Eric F
Furie, Richard
Tanaka, Yoshiya
Kalyani, Rubana N
Abreu, Gabriel
Pineda, Lilia
Tummala, Raj - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Treatment of patients with SLE with anifrolumab resulted in higher BICLA response rates vs placebo at Week 52 in the phase 3 trials, TULIP-2 (16.3% difference; Morand et al, 2020) and TULIP-1 (16.4% difference; Furie et al, 2019). We evaluated BICLA responses to anifrolumab vs placebo at Week 52 in protocol-defined subgroups of patients with active SLE enrolled in the TULIP trials. Methods: TULIP-2 and TULIP-1 were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that evaluated efficacy and safety of intravenous anifrolumab vs placebo administered every 4 weeks, with the primary endpoints assessed at Week 52, in patients with moderate to severe SLE despite standard-of-care treatment. 1, 2 BICLA responses were compared between anifrolumab 300 mg and placebo groups, and robustness of BICLA responses was assessed across protocol-defined subgroups. Results: TULIP-2 (anifrolumab, n=180; placebo, n=182) and TULIP-1 (anifrolumab, n=180; placebo, n=184) had comparable BICLA responses (figure 1 ). Across multiple subgroups, higher percentages of patients achieved BICLA responses at Week 52 in the anifrolumab vs placebo arms. There was concordance of BICLA responses favoring anifrolumab across the protocol-defined subgroups of baseline disease severity (SLEDAI-2K <10 points [difference 15.3%, TULIP-2; 16.9%, TULIP-1] vs ≥10 points [difference 16.7%, TULIP-2; 17.1%, TULIP-1]) and baseline oral corticosteroid use (prednisone or equivalent <10 mg/d [differenceAbstract : Background: Treatment of patients with SLE with anifrolumab resulted in higher BICLA response rates vs placebo at Week 52 in the phase 3 trials, TULIP-2 (16.3% difference; Morand et al, 2020) and TULIP-1 (16.4% difference; Furie et al, 2019). We evaluated BICLA responses to anifrolumab vs placebo at Week 52 in protocol-defined subgroups of patients with active SLE enrolled in the TULIP trials. Methods: TULIP-2 and TULIP-1 were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that evaluated efficacy and safety of intravenous anifrolumab vs placebo administered every 4 weeks, with the primary endpoints assessed at Week 52, in patients with moderate to severe SLE despite standard-of-care treatment. 1, 2 BICLA responses were compared between anifrolumab 300 mg and placebo groups, and robustness of BICLA responses was assessed across protocol-defined subgroups. Results: TULIP-2 (anifrolumab, n=180; placebo, n=182) and TULIP-1 (anifrolumab, n=180; placebo, n=184) had comparable BICLA responses (figure 1 ). Across multiple subgroups, higher percentages of patients achieved BICLA responses at Week 52 in the anifrolumab vs placebo arms. There was concordance of BICLA responses favoring anifrolumab across the protocol-defined subgroups of baseline disease severity (SLEDAI-2K <10 points [difference 15.3%, TULIP-2; 16.9%, TULIP-1] vs ≥10 points [difference 16.7%, TULIP-2; 17.1%, TULIP-1]) and baseline oral corticosteroid use (prednisone or equivalent <10 mg/d [difference 20.1%, TULIP-2; 16.2%, TULIP-1] vs ≥10 mg/d [difference 12.0%, TULIP-2; 17.7%, TULIP-1]). Other subgroups including age, sex, age at onset, race, and anti-drug antibody status showed similar uniformity of response. Conclusions: The uniformity of robust BICLA response rates across prespecified subgroups in both phase 3 trials shows consistent clinical benefit of anifrolumab irrespective of patient baseline characteristics. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Lupus science & medicine. Volume 7(2020)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Lupus science & medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 7(2020)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 7, Issue 1 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 7
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0007-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A20
- Page End:
- A21
- Publication Date:
- 2020-03-23
- Subjects:
- Systemic lupus erythematosus -- Periodicals
616.772005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://lupus.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/lupus-2020-eurolupus.36 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2398-8851
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19073.xml