Thickness accuracy of virtually designed patient‐specific implants for large neurocranial defects. Issue 4 (4th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wittner, Claudia; Borowski, Markus; Pirl, Lukas; Kastner, Johann; Schrempf, Andreas; Schäfer, Ute; Trieb, Klemens; Senck, Sascha
• Is Part Of: Journal of anatomy. Volume 239:Issue 4(2021)
• Page Start: 755
• Page End: 770
• Publication Date: 2021-06-04
• Subjects: computer‐aided design -- cranial flap -- craniofacial defects -- implant design -- thin‐plate splines; Anatomy -- Periodicals; 571.3
• DOI: 10.1111/joa.13465
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0021-8782

Abstract

Abstract: The combination of computer‐aided design (CAD) techniques based on computed tomography (CT) data to generate patient‐specific implants is in use for decades. However, persisting disadvantages are complicated design procedures and rigid reconstruction protocols, for example, for tailored implants mimicking the patient‐specific thickness distribution of missing cranial bone. In this study we used two different approaches, CAD‐ versus thin‐plate spline (TPS)‐based implants, to reconstruct extensive unilateral and bilateral cranial defects in three clinical cases. We used CT data of three complete human crania that were virtually damaged according to the missing regions in the clinical cases. In total, we carried out 132 virtual reconstructions and quantified accuracy from the original to the generated implant and deviations in the resulting implant thickness as root‐mean‐square error (RMSE). Reconstructions using TPS showed an RMSE of 0.08–0.18 mm in relation to geometric accuracy. CAD‐based implants showed an RMSE of 0.50–1.25 mm. RMSE in relation to implant thickness was between 0.63 and 0.70 mm (TPS) while values for CAD‐based implants were significantly higher (0.63–1.67 mm). While both approaches provide implants showing a high accuracy, the TPS‐based approach additionally provides implants that accurately reproduce the patient‐specific thickness distribution of the affected cranial region. Abstract : In this study we used two different approaches, computer‐aided design‐ versus thin‐plate spline (TPS)—based, to reconstruct extensive unilateral and bilateral cranial defects in three clinical cases.While both approaches provide implants showing a low error (<1.25 mm), the TPS—based approach additionally provides implants that accurately reproduce the patient‐specific thickness distribution of the affected cranial region.