O14.5 Chlamydia trachomatis testing: a national evaluation of internet based self-sampling in sweden. (14th July 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Herrmann, Björn; Söderqvist, Joakim; Stark, Lisa; Gullsby, Karolina; Karlsson, Roger; Wikman, Maria
• Is Part Of: Sexually transmitted infections. Volume 95(2019)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A72
• Page End: A72
• Publication Date: 2019-07-14
• Subjects: Chlamydia trachomatis; Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals; HIV infections -- Periodicals; 616.951005
• DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2019-sti.186
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-4973

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) testing in Sweden is free of charge and now exceeds 600, 000 annual tests in a population of 10 million. These tests include internet-based self-sampling tests, a service that gradually has been implemented as a part of routine diagnostics in all 21 counties. To our knowledge Sweden is the country with the highest coverage of internet based self-sampling for CT. This study evaluates the diagnostic outcome for self-sampling. Methods: Requests for both self-sampling at home and clinic based sampling for CT-testing were sent to the laboratories in 18 of 21 counties. All 18 counties provided data on self-sampling in 2017 and 12 counties (representing 80% of the population) provided data on both self-collected samples at home and clinic based testing for the years 2013 to 2017. Results: The proportion of self-sampling increased from 12.9% in 2013 to 17.8% in 2016 when compared to national chlamydia test figures. Between 23% and 26% of delivered test kits were never sent back for analysis during 2013–2017. In analysis of 12 counties self-sampling increased by 110% between 2013 (n=32, 993) and 2017 (n=69, 181) for women, compared to 67% for men (2013: n=21, 008; 2017: n=35, 091). Test volumes for clinic based sampling was fairly constant for both sexes (women 2013 n=245, 274; 2017 n=243, 338; men 2013 n=97, 519; 2017 n=110, 617). The proportion of men was 36% for self-sampling compared to 30% (p<0, 00001) for clinic based sampling, and the positivity rate decreased for both groups from 2013 to 2017 (7, 8% to 7, 1% (p<0, 01)) vs 9.1% to 7.0% (p<0, 0001)). Corresponding figures for women went from 5.3% to 4.6% (p<0, 0001)and from 4.9% to 4.1% (p<0, 0001). Conclusion: Self-sampling has increased significantly in recent years, especially among women. The positivity rate is similar in self-collected and clinic collected samples. Self-sampling reaches men more than clinic based testing, but not as much as expected. Disclosure: No significant relationships.