Epidemiologic Characteristics Associated With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antigen-Based Test Results, Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) Cycle Threshold Values, Subgenomic RNA, and Viral Culture Results From University Testing. (12th April 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Epidemiologic Characteristics Associated With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antigen-Based Test Results, Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) Cycle Threshold Values, Subgenomic RNA, and Viral Culture Results From University Testing. (12th April 2021)
- Main Title:
- Epidemiologic Characteristics Associated With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antigen-Based Test Results, Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) Cycle Threshold Values, Subgenomic RNA, and Viral Culture Results From University Testing
- Authors:
- Ford, Laura
Lee, Christine
Pray, Ian W
Cole, Devlin
Bigouette, John Paul
Abedi, Glen R
Bushman, Dena
Delahoy, Miranda J
Currie, Dustin W
Cherney, Blake
Kirby, Marie K
Fajardo, Geroncio C
Caudill, Motria
Langolf, Kimberly
Kahrs, Juliana
Zochert, Tara
Kelly, Patrick
Pitts, Collin
Lim, Ailam
Aulik, Nicole
Tamin, Azaibi
Harcourt, Jennifer L
Queen, Krista
Zhang, Jing
Whitaker, Brett
Browne, Hannah
Medrzycki, Magdalena
Shewmaker, Patricia L
Bonenfant, Gaston
Zhou, Bin
Folster, Jennifer M
Bankamp, Bettina
Bowen, Michael D
Thornburg, Natalie J
Goffard, Kimberly
Limbago, Brandi
Bateman, Allen
Tate, Jacqueline E
Gieryn, Douglas
Kirking, Hannah L
Westergaard, Ryan P
Killerby, Marie E
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) and antigen tests are important diagnostics for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Sensitivity of antigen tests has been shown to be lower than that of rRT-PCR; however, data to evaluate epidemiologic characteristics that affect test performance are limited. Methods: Paired mid-turbinate nasal swabs were collected from university students and staff and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using both Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA) and rRT-PCR assay. Specimens positive by either rRT-PCR or antigen FIA were placed in viral culture and tested for subgenomic RNA (sgRNA). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate characteristics associated with antigen results, rRT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values, sgRNA, and viral culture. Results: Antigen FIA sensitivity was 78.9% and 43.8% among symptomatic and asymptomatic participants, respectively. Among rRT-PCR positive participants, negative antigen results were more likely among asymptomatic participants (odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3–15.4) and less likely among participants reporting nasal congestion (OR 0.1, 95% CI: .03–.8). rRT-PCR-positive specimens with higher Ct values (OR 0.5, 95% CI: .4–.8) were less likely, and specimens positive for sgRNA (OR 10.2, 95% CI: 1.6–65.0) more likely, to yield positive virus isolation. Antigen testing was >90% positive in specimens with CtAbstract: Background: Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) and antigen tests are important diagnostics for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Sensitivity of antigen tests has been shown to be lower than that of rRT-PCR; however, data to evaluate epidemiologic characteristics that affect test performance are limited. Methods: Paired mid-turbinate nasal swabs were collected from university students and staff and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using both Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA) and rRT-PCR assay. Specimens positive by either rRT-PCR or antigen FIA were placed in viral culture and tested for subgenomic RNA (sgRNA). Logistic regression models were used to evaluate characteristics associated with antigen results, rRT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values, sgRNA, and viral culture. Results: Antigen FIA sensitivity was 78.9% and 43.8% among symptomatic and asymptomatic participants, respectively. Among rRT-PCR positive participants, negative antigen results were more likely among asymptomatic participants (odds ratio [OR] 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3–15.4) and less likely among participants reporting nasal congestion (OR 0.1, 95% CI: .03–.8). rRT-PCR-positive specimens with higher Ct values (OR 0.5, 95% CI: .4–.8) were less likely, and specimens positive for sgRNA (OR 10.2, 95% CI: 1.6–65.0) more likely, to yield positive virus isolation. Antigen testing was >90% positive in specimens with Ct values < 29. Positive predictive value of antigen test for positive viral culture (57.7%) was similar to that of rRT-PCR (59.3%). Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 antigen test advantages include low cost, wide availability and rapid turnaround time, making them important screening tests. The performance of antigen tests may vary with patient characteristics, so performance characteristics should be accounted for when designing testing strategies and interpreting results. Abstract : Quidel Sofia SARS Antigen Fluorescent Immunoassay (FIA) testing was more sensitive in symptomatic participants and specimens with lower cycle threshold values. Characteristics of tests, target population, and patient characteristics should be considered in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing programs. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical infectious diseases. Volume 73:Number 6(2021)
- Journal:
- Clinical infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 73:Number 6(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 73, Issue 6 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 73
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0073-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- e1348
- Page End:
- e1355
- Publication Date:
- 2021-04-12
- Subjects:
- COVID-19 -- SARS-CoV-2 -- RT-PCR -- antigen test -- epidemiology -- Sofia SARS Antigen FIA
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
616.905 - Journal URLs:
- http://cid.oxfordjournals.org ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗
http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/CID/journal ↗
http://www.jstor.org/journals/10584838.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/cid/ciab303 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1058-4838
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3286.293860
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19031.xml