Depth of remission may not predict outcome of UC over 2 years. (13th March 2011)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Burger, D C; Thomas, S J; Walsh, A J; Von Herbay, A; Buchell, O C; Brain, O A; Keshav, S; Travis, S P
• Is Part Of: Gut. Volume 60:(2011)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A133
• Page End: A133
• Publication Date: 2011-03-13
• Subjects: remission -- ulcerative colitis; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1136/gut.2011.239301.282
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-5749

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Remission is the goal of therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC) and a primary endpoint of clinical trials. Disparity between clinical, endoscopic and histological assessments of activity has long been recognised, but since the definition of remission affects clinical and regulatory decisions, the disparity and impact on outcome needs re-evaluation. Methods: Consecutive patients requesting an early appointment were assessed by 4 gastroenterologists, before videosigmoidoscopy and mucosal biopsy. Each scored clinical and endoscopic activity independently. Histological activity was scored by two pathologists. Clinical activity was defined by the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index, endoscopic activity by the Baron score and microscopic activity by the Truelove & Richards' score (remission scores ≤2, ≤1 and 'no significant inflammation' respectively). Outcome measures included treatment escalation, hospitalisation and colectomy. Fleiss' κ was used to evaluate interobserver variation and two-tailed Fisher's exact test to compare outcomes. Results: 91 patients were recruited, median age at diagnosis 31 year (11–66); 60 were in remission by at least one definition: 37 (41%) were in clinical, 30/37 (81%) were also in histological remission, 30/37 (81%) were in endoscopic remission and 20/37 (76%) (20/91 = 22%) were in remission by all three measures. Of 56 in endoscopic remission: 26/56 (46%) had clinical activity and 10/26 (38%) had moderate clinical activity (SCCAI 6–8). Of 47 in histological remission only 42 (81%) were in endoscopic remission and 30 (64%) were in clinical remission. Agreement between histological and endoscopic assessment (k=0.58, moderate agreement) was better than between clinical and endoscopic (k=0.27), or clinical and histological (k=0.47), or between all three methods (k=0.44). follow-up data was available in 54/60 (90%), with 29 month (5–35 month) median follow-up; median age at review 48 year (19–74), 57% female, 30% proctitis, 48% distal, 22% extensive. Most (83%) took maintenance therapy: 5ASA (31/54), immunomodulators (13/54), or infliximab (1/54). 43 (80%) maintained steroid-free remission at 12 month and 34 (63%) during follow-up; of those needing steroids, 9 (45%) had >1 course during follow up and 3 (15%) infliximab. 4 (7%) needed hospitalisation and 1 (2%) colectomy. 12 month steroid-free remission did not differ according to the depth of remission (80% all 3 criteria, 75% on 2 criteria, 83% on 1 criterion, p=0.7). Conclusion: Modest agreement between clinical, endoscopic or histological activity emphasises the differences between the measures, all of which may have prognostic value. Clinical assessment systematically over-estimates disease activity, but the outcome over 2 years was not affected by the definition of remission.