Logic model framework for considering the inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation–research partnership. Issue 9 (11th December 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Logic model framework for considering the inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation–research partnership. Issue 9 (11th December 2019)
- Main Title:
- Logic model framework for considering the inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation–research partnership
- Authors:
- Tabriz, Amir Alishahi
Flocke, Susan A
Shires, Deirdre
Dyer, Karen E
Schreiber, Michelle
Elston Lafata, Jennifer - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: The published literature provides few insights regarding how to develop or consider the effects of knowledge co-production partnerships in the context of delivery system science. Objective: To describe how a healthcare organisation–university-based research partnership was developed and used to design, develop and implement a practice-integrated decision support tool for patients with a physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening. Design: Instrumental case study. Participants: Data were ascertained from project documentation records and semistructured questionnaires sent to 16 healthcare organisation leaders and staff, research investigators and research staff members. Results: Using a logic model framework, we organised the key inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation–university-based research partnership. In addition to pragmatic researchers, partnership inputs included a healthcare organisation with a supportive practice environment and an executive-level project sponsor, a mid-level manager to serve as the organisational champion and continual access to organisational employees with relevant technical, policy and system/process knowledge. During programme design and implementation, partnership processes included using project team meetings, standing organisational meetings and one-on-one consultancies to provide platforms for shared learning and problem solving. Decision-making responsibility was shared between theAbstract : Background: The published literature provides few insights regarding how to develop or consider the effects of knowledge co-production partnerships in the context of delivery system science. Objective: To describe how a healthcare organisation–university-based research partnership was developed and used to design, develop and implement a practice-integrated decision support tool for patients with a physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening. Design: Instrumental case study. Participants: Data were ascertained from project documentation records and semistructured questionnaires sent to 16 healthcare organisation leaders and staff, research investigators and research staff members. Results: Using a logic model framework, we organised the key inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation–university-based research partnership. In addition to pragmatic researchers, partnership inputs included a healthcare organisation with a supportive practice environment and an executive-level project sponsor, a mid-level manager to serve as the organisational champion and continual access to organisational employees with relevant technical, policy and system/process knowledge. During programme design and implementation, partnership processes included using project team meetings, standing organisational meetings and one-on-one consultancies to provide platforms for shared learning and problem solving. Decision-making responsibility was shared between the healthcare organisation and research team. We discuss the short-term outcomes of the partnership, including how the partnership affected the current research team's knowledge and health system initiatives. Conclusion: Using a logic model framework, we have described how a healthcare organisation–university-based research team partnership was developed. Others interested in developing, implementing and evaluating knowledge co-production partnerships in the context of delivery system science projects can use the experiences to consider ways to develop, implement and evaluate similar co-production partnerships. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ quality & safety. Volume 29:Issue 9(2020)
- Journal:
- BMJ quality & safety
- Issue:
- Volume 29:Issue 9(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29, Issue 9 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 29
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0029-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 746
- Page End:
- 755
- Publication Date:
- 2019-12-11
- Subjects:
- delivery system science -- health care stakeholder engagement -- implementation science -- knowledge co-production -- quality improvement
Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals
Health facilities -- Risk management -- Periodicals
Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals
362.106805 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://qualitysafety.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010059 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2044-5415
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18994.xml