Disruption prediction on EAST tokamak using a deep learning algorithm. (24th September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Disruption prediction on EAST tokamak using a deep learning algorithm. (24th September 2021)
- Main Title:
- Disruption prediction on EAST tokamak using a deep learning algorithm
- Authors:
- Guo, B H
Chen, D L
Shen, B
Rea, C
Granetz, R S
Zeng, L
Hu, W H
Qian, J P
Sun, Y W
Xiao, B J - Abstract:
- Abstract: In this study, a long short-term memory (LSTM) model is trained on a large disruption warning database to predict the disruption on EAST tokomak. To compare the performance of the proposed model with the previously reported full convolutional neural network (CNN) (Guo et al 2020 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 63 025008), the same data set and diagnostic signals are used. Based on the test set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, i.e. the AUC value of the LSTM model is obtained as 0.87, and the true positive rate (TPR) is sim87.5%, while the false positive rate (FPR) is sim15.1%. Since the LSTM model is more sensitive to radiation fluctuations than CNN, the prediction performance of LSTM model is inferior to that of CNN model (for CNN, AUC sim 0.92, TPR sim 87.5%, FPR sim 6.1%). However, the advance warning time of LSTM model is 14 ms earlier than that of CNN. To reduce the FPR and improve the performance of the model, more fast bolometer channels are added as the input signals of the LSTM model, including the radiation from the upper and lower edges and the plasma core. Consequently, for the same test set, the AUC value increases to 0.89, and the FPR decreases to sim9.4%, but the TPR also decreases to sim83.9%. In addition, the sensitivity of the model to radiation fluctuations caused by impurity behavior decreases significantly, and the warning time becomes 8.7 ms earlier as compared to that of the original model. Overall, it is proved thatAbstract: In this study, a long short-term memory (LSTM) model is trained on a large disruption warning database to predict the disruption on EAST tokomak. To compare the performance of the proposed model with the previously reported full convolutional neural network (CNN) (Guo et al 2020 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 63 025008), the same data set and diagnostic signals are used. Based on the test set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, i.e. the AUC value of the LSTM model is obtained as 0.87, and the true positive rate (TPR) is sim87.5%, while the false positive rate (FPR) is sim15.1%. Since the LSTM model is more sensitive to radiation fluctuations than CNN, the prediction performance of LSTM model is inferior to that of CNN model (for CNN, AUC sim 0.92, TPR sim 87.5%, FPR sim 6.1%). However, the advance warning time of LSTM model is 14 ms earlier than that of CNN. To reduce the FPR and improve the performance of the model, more fast bolometer channels are added as the input signals of the LSTM model, including the radiation from the upper and lower edges and the plasma core. Consequently, for the same test set, the AUC value increases to 0.89, and the FPR decreases to sim9.4%, but the TPR also decreases to sim83.9%. In addition, the sensitivity of the model to radiation fluctuations caused by impurity behavior decreases significantly, and the warning time becomes 8.7 ms earlier as compared to that of the original model. Overall, it is proved that deep learning algorithms exhibit immense application potential in the disruption prediction of long-pulse fusion devices. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Plasma physics and controlled fusion. Volume 63:Number 11(2021)
- Journal:
- Plasma physics and controlled fusion
- Issue:
- Volume 63:Number 11(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 63, Issue 11 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 63
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0063-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09-24
- Subjects:
- disruptions -- predictions -- EAST -- tokamak -- deep learning
Plasma (Ionized gases) -- Periodicals
Controlled fusion -- Periodicals
530.44 - Journal URLs:
- http://ioppublishing.org/ ↗
http://iopscience.iop.org/0741-3335 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1088/1361-6587/ac228b ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0741-3335
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19029.xml