A comparison between the ICNP and the ICF for expressing nursing content in the electronic health record. (October 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A comparison between the ICNP and the ICF for expressing nursing content in the electronic health record. (October 2021)
- Main Title:
- A comparison between the ICNP and the ICF for expressing nursing content in the electronic health record
- Authors:
- Florin, Jan
Strandberg, Elisabeth
Jansson, Inger
Ehrenberg, Anna
Björvell, Catrin - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: The use of standardised terminologies for electronic health records (EHRs) is important and a sufficient coverage of all aspects of health care is increasingly being developed worldwide. The International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities and Health (ICF) is suggested as a unifying terminology suitable in a multi-professional EHR, but the level of representation of nursing content is unclear. Objectives: The aim was to describe lexical and semantic accordance in relation to comprehensiveness and granularity of concepts between the International Classification of Nursing Practise (ICNP) and the ICF. Methods: 806 pre-coordinated concepts for diagnoses and outcomes in the ICNP terminology were manually mapped to 1516 concepts on level 4–6 in the ICF. Results: Several dimensions of nursing diagnoses and outcomes in the ICNP were missing in the ICF. 60% of the concepts for diagnosis and outcome in the ICNP could not be stated using the ICF while another 31% could only be matched either as a subordinate or as a superordinate concept. Conclusions: The lexical and semantic accordance in relation to comprehensiveness and granularity between concepts in the ICNP and ICF was rather low. A large proportion of concepts for diagnoses and outcomes in the ICNP could not be satisfactorily stated using the ICF. Standardised terminologies rooted in a nursing tradition (e.g., the ICNP) is needed for communication and documentation in health care to represent theAbstract: Background: The use of standardised terminologies for electronic health records (EHRs) is important and a sufficient coverage of all aspects of health care is increasingly being developed worldwide. The International Classification of Functioning, Disabilities and Health (ICF) is suggested as a unifying terminology suitable in a multi-professional EHR, but the level of representation of nursing content is unclear. Objectives: The aim was to describe lexical and semantic accordance in relation to comprehensiveness and granularity of concepts between the International Classification of Nursing Practise (ICNP) and the ICF. Methods: 806 pre-coordinated concepts for diagnoses and outcomes in the ICNP terminology were manually mapped to 1516 concepts on level 4–6 in the ICF. Results: Several dimensions of nursing diagnoses and outcomes in the ICNP were missing in the ICF. 60% of the concepts for diagnosis and outcome in the ICNP could not be stated using the ICF while another 31% could only be matched either as a subordinate or as a superordinate concept. Conclusions: The lexical and semantic accordance in relation to comprehensiveness and granularity between concepts in the ICNP and ICF was rather low. A large proportion of concepts for diagnoses and outcomes in the ICNP could not be satisfactorily stated using the ICF. Standardised terminologies rooted in a nursing tradition (e.g., the ICNP) is needed for communication and documentation in health care to represent the patient's health situation as well as professional diagnostic decisions and evaluations in nursing. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of medical informatics. Volume 154(2021)
- Journal:
- International journal of medical informatics
- Issue:
- Volume 154(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 154, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 154
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0154-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-10
- Subjects:
- Concept mapping -- ICF -- ICNP -- Nursing diagnoses -- Nursing outcomes
Medical informatics -- Periodicals
Information science -- Periodicals
Computers -- Periodicals
Medical technology -- Periodicals
Medical Informatics -- Periodicals
Technology, Medical -- Periodicals
Computers
Information science
Medical informatics
Medical technology
Electronic journals
Periodicals
Electronic journals
610.285 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/13865056 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/13865056 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/13865056 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104544 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1386-5056
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.345250
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 19014.xml