Rolling resistance and sinkage analysis by comparing FEM and experimental data for a grape transporting vehicle. (October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: di Maria, Enrico; Reina, Giulio; Ishii, Kazuo; Giannoccaro, Nicola Ivan
• Is Part Of: Journal of terramechanics. Volume 97(2021)
• Page Start: 59
• Page End: 70
• Publication Date: 2021-10
• Subjects: Cone penetration test -- Pull test -- Resistance coefficient -- Rut formation -- Response surface -- Vineyard; Trafficability -- Periodicals; Praticabilité (Routes) -- Périodiques; Trafficability; Periodicals; 629.222
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2021.06.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-4898

Abstract

Highlights: Field experiments are conducted in a vineyard to estimate soil properties. Three soil conditions are considered: soft soil, firm soil, and wet saturated soil. Resistance coefficient and sinkage are evaluated by FEM for different wheel sizes. The results are analyzed through response surfaces. Abstract: In this study a 2D FEM model was developed to analyze ruts formation, rolling resistance, and power loss for a grape transporting cart aimed to replace the use of heavy tractors while harvesting grape. The model was supported by experiments in a vineyard in South Italy. Cone penetration tests were conducted to estimate frictional and cohesive properties in three soil conditions: firm, soft, and wet saturated. A tractor pulled test rig for a single wheel was developed to measure rolling resistance and sinkage, and complete the selection of the soil parameters. Completed the model, the analysis was conducted for a range of different wheel dimensions, and the outputs analyzed through response surfaces. The results showed the different impacts that width and diameter have on ruts formation and rolling resistance for different soil conditions. Wider wheels determined a main reduction of the sinkage, while the width contribution to the rolling resistance was affected by the total soil volume deformed. Larger diameters led to lower rolling resistance, with a higher impact on more deformable soils. Contact stress was compared with the thresholds recommended in the literature to determine the acceptable designs. This analysis represents a tool to select the running gear dimensions.