Relationship between pre‐incision Pupillary Pain Index and post‐incision heart rate and pupillary diameter variation in children. Issue 10 (18th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sabourdin, Nada; Del Bove, Loïc; Louvet, Nicolas; Luzon‐Chetrit, Sarah; Tavernier, Benoît; Constant, Isabelle
• Editors: Vutskits, Laszlo
• Is Part Of: Paediatric anaesthesia. Volume 31:Issue 10(2021)
• Page Start: 1121
• Page End: 1128
• Publication Date: 2021-07-18
• Subjects: anesthesia -- monitoring -- pediatric -- pupil; Pediatric anesthesia -- Periodicals; 617.96798
• DOI: 10.1111/pan.14253
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1155-5645

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The Pupillary Pain Index is a recent pupillometric index designed to assess the level of analgesia under general anesthesia in children and adults. If analgesia is inadequate, acute nociceptive stimuli such as skin incision may induce significant hemodynamic disturbances. Aims: Our aim was to investigate the potential relationship between pre‐incision Pupillary Pain Index and heart rate increase following skin incision in children. Methods: This was a prospective, non‐randomized, registered pilot study. We included children undergoing surgery under general anesthesia. Pupillary Pain Index was assessed 2 min before skin incision. Then, heart rate maximal variation (ΔHR ) and pupillary diameter maximal variation (ΔPD ) in the minute following incision were recorded. Spearman coefficient was calculated to characterize the relationship between Pupillary Pain Index and ΔHR or ΔPD . Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, we also studied the predictive value of pre‐incision Pupillary Pain Index for heart rate and pupillary diameter reactivity. Results: 53 patients were included (10 ± 4 years, 40 ± 19 kg). There was a modest correlation between pre‐incision Pupillary Pain Index and ΔHR (Spearman rs = 0.35 [0.05–0.57], p = .011), and between pre‐incision Pupillary Pain Index and ΔPD (Spearman rs = 0.54 [0.33–0.71], p < .001). Regarding the predictive value of Pupillary Pain Index for heart rate or pupillary diameter reactivity, the corresponding areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.90 [0.82–0.99] and 0.78 [0.65–0.93], respectively. A threshold of Pupillary Pain Index <3 predicted the absence of heart rate reactivity at incision with a good performance (negative predictive value = 1). Conclusions: In children, pre‐incision Pupillary Pain Index was moderately correlated with post‐incision nociception. Pre‐incision Pupillary Pain Index had good predictive performances for heart rate or pupillary diameter reactivity to skin incision. Pre‐incision Pupillary Pain Index <3 might predict the absence of heart rate reaction to incision.