T‐cell response after first dose of BNT162b2 SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine among healthcare workers with previous infection or cross‐reactive immunity. Issue 9 (8th September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- T‐cell response after first dose of BNT162b2 SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine among healthcare workers with previous infection or cross‐reactive immunity. Issue 9 (8th September 2021)
- Main Title:
- T‐cell response after first dose of BNT162b2 SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine among healthcare workers with previous infection or cross‐reactive immunity
- Authors:
- Casado, Jose L
Haemmerle, Johannes
Vizcarra, Pilar
Rodriguez‐Dominguez, Mario
Velasco, Tamara
Velasco, Hector
Centenera, Elena
Romero‐Hernandez, Beatriz
Fernandez‐Escribano, Marina
Vallejo, Alejandro - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: Antibody response to the first dose of BNT162b2 SARS‐CoV‐2 is greater in COVID‐19‐convalescent than in infection‐naïve individuals. However, there are no data about T‐cell response in individuals with pre‐existing cellular immunity. Methods: We evaluated T‐cell responses in parallel with SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody level after first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in 23 infection‐naïve and 27 convalescent healthcare workers (HCWs) previously included in a study about humoral and T‐cell immunity. Results: Overall, the antibody response was lower in the infection‐naïve group than in convalescent individuals (18 895 vs 662.7 AU mL −1, P < 0.001), and intermediate but significantly lower in convalescent HCWs with previous negative serology (25 174 vs 1793 AU mL −1 ; P = 0.015). Indeed, anti‐spike IgG titres after the first dose correlated with baseline anti‐nucleocapsid IgG titres (rho = 0.689; P < 0.001). Pre‐existing T‐cell immunity was observed in 78% of convalescent and 65% of the infection‐naïve HCWs. T‐cell response after the first dose of the vaccine was observed in nearly all the cases with pre‐existing T‐cell immunity, reaching 94% in convalescent HCWs and 93% in those with cross‐reactive T cells. It was lower in the infection‐naïve group (50%; P = 0.087) and in convalescent HCWs with negative serology (56%; P = 0.085). Notably, systemic reactogenicity after vaccination was mainly observed in those with pre‐existing T‐cell immunity ( P = 0.051). Conclusion:Abstract: Objectives: Antibody response to the first dose of BNT162b2 SARS‐CoV‐2 is greater in COVID‐19‐convalescent than in infection‐naïve individuals. However, there are no data about T‐cell response in individuals with pre‐existing cellular immunity. Methods: We evaluated T‐cell responses in parallel with SARS‐CoV‐2 antibody level after first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in 23 infection‐naïve and 27 convalescent healthcare workers (HCWs) previously included in a study about humoral and T‐cell immunity. Results: Overall, the antibody response was lower in the infection‐naïve group than in convalescent individuals (18 895 vs 662.7 AU mL −1, P < 0.001), and intermediate but significantly lower in convalescent HCWs with previous negative serology (25 174 vs 1793 AU mL −1 ; P = 0.015). Indeed, anti‐spike IgG titres after the first dose correlated with baseline anti‐nucleocapsid IgG titres (rho = 0.689; P < 0.001). Pre‐existing T‐cell immunity was observed in 78% of convalescent and 65% of the infection‐naïve HCWs. T‐cell response after the first dose of the vaccine was observed in nearly all the cases with pre‐existing T‐cell immunity, reaching 94% in convalescent HCWs and 93% in those with cross‐reactive T cells. It was lower in the infection‐naïve group (50%; P = 0.087) and in convalescent HCWs with negative serology (56%; P = 0.085). Notably, systemic reactogenicity after vaccination was mainly observed in those with pre‐existing T‐cell immunity ( P = 0.051). Conclusion: Here, we report that the first dose of BTN162b2 elicits a similar S‐specific T‐cell response in cases of either past infection or cross‐reactive T cells, but lower in the rest of infection‐naïve individuals and in convalescent HCWs who have lost detectable specific antibodies during follow‐up. Abstract : In this study, we found that a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine generates a strong humoral (100%) and cellular response in convalescent COVID‐19 individuals (94%), and also in infection‐naïve healthcare workers with cross‐reactive immunity because of other coronaviruses (93%). However, this response was not observed in convalescent individuals with previous loss of specific antibodies after the disease, who had a T‐cell response similar to that of other infection‐naïve individuals. Thus, different factors could influence the rate of humoral and cellular responses to the vaccine. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Clinical & translational immunology. Volume 10:Issue 9(2021)
- Journal:
- Clinical & translational immunology
- Issue:
- Volume 10:Issue 9(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 10, Issue 9 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 10
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0010-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09-08
- Subjects:
- antibodies -- cellular immunity -- COVID‐19 -- cross‐reactivity -- mRNA vaccine -- SARS‐CoV‐2
Immunologic diseases -- Periodicals
Immunology -- Periodicals
Clinical medicine -- Periodicals
Immune System Diseases -- therapy
Immunotherapy
Immunologic Factors -- therapeutic use
Translational Medical Research
Molecular Targeted Therapy
Clinical medicine
Immunologic diseases
Immunology
Periodicals
Periodicals
Fulltext
Internet Resources
Periodicals
616.079 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.nature.com/cti/index.html ↗
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/2610/ ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2050-0068 ↗
http://www.nature.com/ ↗
http://www.nature.com/cti/index.html ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/cti2.1341 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2050-0068
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18975.xml