Agreement of Fixation Disparity Curve between Two Different Instruments. Issue 6 (June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hashemi, Hassan; Mirzaeian, Maryam; Narooie, Foroozan; Nabovati, Payam; Yekta, Abbasali; Ostadimoghaddam, Hadi; Sardari, Sara; Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
• Is Part Of: Optometry and vision science. Volume 98:Issue 6(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-06
• Subjects: Optometry -- Periodicals; Physiological optics -- Periodicals; Vision disorders -- Periodicals; 617.7505
• DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000001708
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1040-5488

Abstract

Abstract : SIGNIFICANCE: Fixation disparity tests with various characteristics of fusional stimulus are very important for assessment of decompensated heterophoria. The results suggest that there was no reasonable agreement between the fixation disparity curve's parameters of the modified near Mallett unit and the Sheedy disparometer. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the agreement of the fixation disparity curve parameters between the modified near Mallett unit and the Sheedy disparometer in patients with decompensated near heterophoria. METHODS: A total of 147 young adults (mean age, 22.7 ± 4.8 years) participated in this cross-sectional study. After applying the exclusion criteria, the statistical analysis was done on the data of 134 individuals. All participants underwent preliminary optometric examinations including the measurement of uncorrected and best-corrected visual acuity, objective and subjective refraction, and unilateral and alternating cover tests. The fixation disparity was evaluated using the modified near Mallett unit and the Sheedy disparometer at 40 cm, and forced-vergence fixation disparity curves were generated. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences in the fixation disparity curve parameters (except the center of symmetry) between the two devices. The median fixation disparity measured by the Sheedy disparometer was more positive compared with the modified near Mallett unit (toward more esodisparity or less exodisparity). The median associated phoria measured by the Sheedy disparometer was more positive compared with the Mallett unit. Also, the slope of the curve obtained by the Mallett unit was steeper. The wide limits of agreement indicated the poor agreement of all fixation disparity curve parameters between the two instruments.