Facial Feminization Surgery under Insurance: The University of California Los Angeles Experience. Issue 5 (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hu, Allison C.; Dang, Brian N.; Bertrand, Anthony A.; Jain, Nirbhay S.; Chan, Candace H.; Lee, Justine C.
• Is Part Of: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Volume 9:Issue 5(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; 617.95205
• DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003572
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-7574

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Despite improved insurance coverage for gender confirmation surgeries in the United States, coverage for facial feminization surgery (FFS) continues to be difficult. Here, we describe our institutional experience on navigation, time, and costs of the FFS insurance authorization process. Methods: FFS consults (n = 40) at the University of California, Los Angeles (2018–2020) were reviewed for time and cost to definitive insurance authorization decision. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on authorization process: Group A (standard approval, n = 26, 65.0%) including public and private insurances; Group B (extended approval, n = 10, 25.0%) consisting of private insurance plans that initially denied and required multi-level appeals for denial overturn; and Group C (denial, n = 4, 10.0%), including private insurance plans that denied even after multi-level appeals. Results: An estimated 90% of all patient consults were approved for FFS under insurance. Group A averaged 1.1 months for approval, requiring 1.4 hours of administrative time translating to $38.18 per patient. The addition of multi-level appeals in Groups B and C increased the total time for a definitive decision (7.0 and 5.1 months, respectively) and required both surgeon and administrative time to navigate the process (10.8 and 12.0 hours, respectively). The time spent on the presurgical authorization process for Groups B and C translated to an over 20-fold increase in cost ($855.00 and $988.38, respectively) compared with Group A. Conclusion: Navigation of the insurance process for FFS is challenging and time-consuming; however, coverage is a reality in California provided that multi-level appeals are exhausted.