Temporary mechanical circulatory support devices: updates from recent studies. (July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Marbach, Jeffrey A.; Chweich, Haval; Miyashita, Satoshi; Kapur, Navin K.
• Is Part Of: Current opinion in cardiology. Volume 36:Number 4(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-07
• Subjects: cardiogenic Shock -- impella -- intra-aortic balloon pump -- mechanical circulatory support -- venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Cardiology -- Periodicals; Heart Diseases -- Periodicals; Cardiology; Periodicals; 616.12
• DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000880
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0268-4705

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose of review: Over the past several years, the role of short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices has become the dominant focus in efforts to improve outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Alongside these efforts, temporary MCS devices have been increasingly used to support patients prior to cardiac surgery, during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention, awaiting cardiac transplantation, and in the setting of refractory cardiac arrest. The present review aims to provide an update on the recent literature evaluating the evolving role of temporary MCS devices, and to provide insights into the current challenges and future directions of MCS research. Recent findings: Recent observational data have demonstrated potential roles for intra-aortic balloon pump preoperatively in high-risk patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting, and advanced heart failure patients awaiting transplantation. Impella continues to demonstrate promising results as part of an early MCS strategy in CS, as a temporary bridge to transplantation, and as a mechanism for left ventricular unloading in patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Finally, the first randomized trial of ECMO facilitated resuscitation in the United States demonstrated improved survival in patients with refractory out of hospital cardiac arrest. Summary: Though randomized data remains limited, observational data continue to support the role of temporary MCS devices in a variety of clinical settings.