Institutional experience of in-stent stenosis after pipeline flow diverter implantation: A retrospective analysis of 6 isolated cases out of 118 patients. Issue 11 (19th March 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Ting; Richard, Seidu A.; Jiao, He; Li, Junrao; Lin, Sen; Zhang, Changwei; Wang, Chaohua; Xie, Xiaodong; You, Chao
• Other Names: Schaller. Bernhard section editor.
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 100:Issue 11(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-03-19
• Subjects: aneurysm -- intracranial -- in-stent stenosis -- malapposition -- occlusion -- pipeline embolization devices; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025149
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Abstract: Pipeline embolization devices (PLEDs) are flow diverting stents that have exhibited be safe and efficient in the treatment of complex aneurysms. Nevertheless, in-stent stenosis (ISS) has been reported as one of the cardinal complications associated with PLED. The association of wall malapposition and ISS in patient treated with PLED has not been reported. A retrospective study was conducted to identify patients with ISS after implantation of PLED as treatment for intracranial aneurysms from April 25, 2018 to April 24, 2019. Incidence of ISS and its associated causes such as sharp change of the PLED, distal wall malapposition, inconsistent compliance between parent artery as well as the PLED occlusion due to intimal hyperplasia and vessel tortuosity. Assessment of conservative treatment and retreatment outcomes of ISS were documented. In all, 6 ISS cases were identified by 2 independent neurointerventionalists out of 118 aneurysm patients treated with PLED. Thus, the incidence rate of ISS in patients treated with PLED was as low as 5% at our institution compared to other studies. The follow-up time for detection of ISS ranged from 6 to 12 months after implantation. Several combinations of reasons such as sharp change of the PLED, distal wall malapposition, inconsistent compliance between parent arteries as well as PLED occlusion due to intimal hyperplasia and vessel tortuosity accounted for the causes of ISS during our analysis. Conservative treatment with a combination of antiplatelet during follow-ups did not resolve the ISS in our study probably due to associated underlying factors above.