Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Convalescent Plasma Versus Standard Plasma in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infected Hospitalized Patients in New York: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial*. Issue 7 (July 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Convalescent Plasma Versus Standard Plasma in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infected Hospitalized Patients in New York: A Double-Blind Randomized Trial*. Issue 7 (July 2021)
- Main Title:
- Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Convalescent Plasma Versus Standard Plasma in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infected Hospitalized Patients in New York
- Authors:
- Bennett-Guerrero, Elliott
Romeiser, Jamie L.
Talbot, Lillian R.
Ahmed, Tahmeena
Mamone, Linda J.
Singh, Sunitha M.
Hearing, Janet C.
Salman, Huda
Holiprosad, Dishaw D.
Freedenberg, Alex T.
Carter, Jason A.
Browne, Nicholas J.
Cosgrove, Megan E.
Shevik, Margaret E.
Generale, Laura M.
Andrew, Margaret A.
Nachman, Sharon
Fries, Bettina C.
Bennett-Guerrero, Elliott
Ahmed, Tahmeena
Fries, Bettina C.
Nachman, Sharon
Romeiser, Jamie
Salman, Huda
Senzel, Lisa
Spitzer, Eric
Caravella, Giuseppina
Harper, Laura
Kaell, Diana
Keister, Melanie
Komatsu, David
Lamb, Jessica
Lee, Deidre
O'Keefe, Jane
Pallai, Ajish
Roemer, Elizabeth
Scherl, William
Skinner, Sandra
Smith-McAllister, Leah
Rago, Molly
Brand, Margaret
Bryan, Andrew
Festa, Lauren
Fiore, Susan
Harbourne, Shannen
Hecker-Crawford, Audrey
Lavorna, Ann
McKenna, Caryn
Repetti, Robert
Roggemann, Curtis
Sahib, Haseena
Shevik, Margaret
Singh, Sunitha
Stein, Ruth
Vivas, Kathy
Andrew, Margaret
Anderson, Audrey
Arata, Joan
Baumeister, Marlene
Boudreau, Susan
Brill, Patricia
Daley, Noelle
Gearwar, Christine
Generale, Laura
Halper, Darcy
Healy, Erin J.
Letscher, Coleen
Madigan, Dawn
Markarian-Askinazi, Katherine
Mavarez-Martinez, Ana
Munoz, Sebastian
Pol, Christine
Propper, Grace
Holiprosad, Dishaw
Fernando, Rajeev
Seshan, Nandini
Pham, Sophia
Talbot, Lillian
Browne, Nicholas
Carter, Jason
Cosgrove, Megan
Freedenberg, Alex
Sisti, Andrew
Grewal, Suman
Vacchi-Suzzi, Caterina
Wong, Angie
Califf, Robert
Bandarenko, Nicholas
McMahon, Timothy
Hou, Wei
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : OBJECTIVES: Four peer-reviewed publications have reported results from randomized controlled trials of convalescent plasma for coronavirus disease 2019 infection; none were conducted in the United States nor used standard plasma as a comparator. To determine if administration of convalescent plasma to patients with coronavirus disease 2019 increases antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and improves outcome. DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Hospital in New York. PATIENTS: Patients with polymerase chain reaction documented coronavirus disease 2019 infection. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized (4:1) to receive 2 U of convalescent plasma versus standard plasma. Antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 were measured in plasma units and in trial recipients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Enrollment was terminated after emergency use authorization was granted for convalescent plasma. Seventy-four patients were randomized. At baseline, mean (SD) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (23.4 [5.6] and 22.5 [6.6]), percent of patients intubated (19% and 20%), and median (interquartile range) days from symptom onset to randomization of 9 (6–18) and 9 (6–15), were similar in the convalescent plasma versus standard plasma arms, respectively. Convalescent plasma had high neutralizing activity (median [interquartile range] titer 1:526 [1:359–1:786]) and its administration increasedAbstract : OBJECTIVES: Four peer-reviewed publications have reported results from randomized controlled trials of convalescent plasma for coronavirus disease 2019 infection; none were conducted in the United States nor used standard plasma as a comparator. To determine if administration of convalescent plasma to patients with coronavirus disease 2019 increases antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and improves outcome. DESIGN: Double-blind randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Hospital in New York. PATIENTS: Patients with polymerase chain reaction documented coronavirus disease 2019 infection. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized (4:1) to receive 2 U of convalescent plasma versus standard plasma. Antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 were measured in plasma units and in trial recipients. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Enrollment was terminated after emergency use authorization was granted for convalescent plasma. Seventy-four patients were randomized. At baseline, mean (SD) Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (23.4 [5.6] and 22.5 [6.6]), percent of patients intubated (19% and 20%), and median (interquartile range) days from symptom onset to randomization of 9 (6–18) and 9 (6–15), were similar in the convalescent plasma versus standard plasma arms, respectively. Convalescent plasma had high neutralizing activity (median [interquartile range] titer 1:526 [1:359–1:786]) and its administration increased antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 by 14.4%, whereas standard plasma administration led to an 8.6% decrease ( p = 0.005). No difference was observed for ventilator-free days through 28 days (primary study endpoint): median (interquartile range) of 28 (2–28) versus 28 (0–28; p = 0.86) for the convalescent plasma and standard plasma groups, respectively. A greater than or equal to 2 point improvement in the World Health Organization scale was achieved by 20% of subjects in both arms ( p = 0.99). All-cause mortality through 90 days was numerically lower in the convalescent plasma versus standard plasma groups (27% vs 33%; p = 0.63) but did not achieve statistical significance. A key prespecified subgroup analysis of time to death in patients who were intubated at baseline was statistically significant; however, sample size numbers were small. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of convalescent plasma to hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 infection increased antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2 but was not associated with improved outcome. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Critical care medicine. Volume 49:Issue 7(2021)
- Journal:
- Critical care medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 49:Issue 7(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 49, Issue 7 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 49
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0049-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-07
- Subjects:
- convalescent plasma -- coronavirus disease 2019 -- infection -- randomized
Critical care medicine -- Periodicals
Soins intensifs -- Périodiques
616.028 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005066 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0090-3493
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3487.451000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18937.xml