Design of prestressed, jointed columns for enhanced seismic performance. (October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thonstad, Travis; Eberhard, Marc O.; Stanton, John F.
• Is Part Of: Structures. Volume 33(2021)
• Page Start: 1007
• Page End: 1019
• Publication Date: 2021-10
• Subjects: Bridge design -- Seismic design -- Earthquake engineering -- Jointed columns -- Rocking columns -- Prestressed concrete -- High-performance structures; Structural engineering -- Periodicals; 624.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.01.105
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-0124

Abstract

Abstract: Jointed, prestressed columns have been shown to enable accelerated construction and to offer superior seismic performance, as compared with cast-in-place columns without prestressing. During an earthquake, such columns deform primarily through concentrated rotations at the joints, and special detailing at the ends of the columns prevents crushing and spalling. Unbonded prestressing steel, running vertically through the columns, provides a restoring moment that returns the columns to plumb after the ground motion stops. The use of prefabricated substructure elements speeds up the bridge assembly by eliminating building formwork, fixing steel, casting and curing concrete on-site. A variety of detailing strategies have been developed for jointed, prestressed columns, but their fundamental behavior is similar. More importantly, this behavior differs from that of conventional reinforced concrete columns for which current seismic code provisions were developed. This paper develops a displacement-based procedure for designing jointed, prestressed columns that is based on the framework provided by the AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design. To account for the unique characteristics of these systems, the design procedure introduces new performance criteria; it also provides recommendations for proportioning the prestressed and non-prestressed steel, calculating the effective column stiffness, and estimating the column displacement capacity. The focus of the paper is on columns with pretensioned strands and internal energy dissipaters, although the procedure would work for post-tensioned systems and those with external dissipaters as well. This design approach is critically evaluated through comparison to the results of both cyclic tests of cantilever columns and shaking table tests of a two-span bridge system.