An investigation of bridge influence line identification using time-domain and frequency-domain methods. (October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mustafa, Samim; Yoshida, Ikumasa; Sekiya, Hidehiko
• Is Part Of: Structures. Volume 33(2021)
• Page Start: 2061
• Page End: 2065
• Publication Date: 2021-10
• Subjects: Bridge influence line -- Time-domain method -- Frequency-domain method -- Displacement response -- Steel girder bridge -- Calibration trucks; Structural engineering -- Periodicals; 624.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.05.082
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2352-0124

Abstract

Abstract: The method to obtain an accurate influence line (IL) from the direct measurement is an important research topic for structural condition assessment, model correction and bridge weigh-in-motion (BWIM) system. The two most common approaches used for the identification of IL are the time-domain (TD) method and the frequency-domain (FD) method. Despite having a similar mathematical framework, the TD and the FD methods are treated as two different methods by the researchers working on this field. This paper presents a detailed theoretical demonstration to show that the two methods discussed above are nothing but the same. The two methods were compared experimentally by using field measurement data on an existing steel girder bridge which were obtained by using three calibration trucks (CTs) with different axle weights and axle configurations. Although the ILs identified by the two methods were apparently different, but a theoretical insight into the frameworks revealed that the TD and FD methods are basically the same and a seeming difference between the two methods is due to the inherent assumptions involved in the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) such as the assumption of cyclic nature of analysis interval. Finally, a method to obtain an accurate influence line has been outlined.