A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle. (31st December 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle. (31st December 2021)
- Main Title:
- A critical analysis of drag force modelling for disperse gas-liquid flow in a pipe with an obstacle
- Authors:
- Tas-Koehler, Sibel
Liao, Yixiang
Hampel, Uwe - Abstract:
- Highlights: The capabilities of different drag models under high turbulence /vortex flow conditions are shown. Impacts of turbulence effects on drag modelling are presented. A hybrid drag model is proposed for high turbulence flow conditions. Two-phase flow hydrodynamics under complex flow conditions is analyzed. Gas velocity and void fraction predictions are compared with experimental data. Abstract: The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves theHighlights: The capabilities of different drag models under high turbulence /vortex flow conditions are shown. Impacts of turbulence effects on drag modelling are presented. A hybrid drag model is proposed for high turbulence flow conditions. Two-phase flow hydrodynamics under complex flow conditions is analyzed. Gas velocity and void fraction predictions are compared with experimental data. Abstract: The accuracy of the modelling of gas–liquid flows depends strongly on a suitable modelling of the interfacial forces. Among these, drag is dominant. Most drag models reported in the literature have been derived and validated only for laminar or low-turbulent flow conditions. In this study, we numerically evaluated several drag models from the literature for high-turbulent gas–liquid flow around an obstacle in a pipe that creates a distinct vortex region. We performed Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations and compared the void fraction and gas velocity profiles with experimental data obtained by ultrafast X-ray computed tomography. We found that all models, except Schiller&Naumann and Feng, predicted the void fraction well compared to experimental data upstream of the obstacle, i.e., for a developed two-phase pipe flow with axial symmetry. However, the void fraction downstream is greatly overestimated by all models except those that appropriately consider the turbulence effects. Based on the results, a hybrid drag model is proposed that significantly improves the prediction of the void fraction. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Chemical engineering science. Volume 246(2021)
- Journal:
- Chemical engineering science
- Issue:
- Volume 246(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 246, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 246
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0246-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-12-31
- Subjects:
- CFD -- Bubbly flow -- Drag force coefficient -- Turbulence -- Vortex -- Hybrid drag model
BIT Bubble-Induced Turbulence -- CFD Computational Fluid Dynamics -- FAD Favre-Averaged Drag -- MUSIG Multiple Size Group Model -- SST Shear Stress Transport -- UFXCT Ultrafast X-ray Computed Tomography
Chemical engineering -- Periodicals
Génie chimique -- Périodiques
Chemical engineering
Periodicals
Electronic journals
660 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00092509 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ces.2021.117007 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0009-2509
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3146.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18911.xml