Patient-reported outcomes for nipple reconstruction: Review of literature. Issue 5 (October 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Patient-reported outcomes for nipple reconstruction: Review of literature. Issue 5 (October 2021)
- Main Title:
- Patient-reported outcomes for nipple reconstruction: Review of literature
- Authors:
- Tan, Yan Yu
Chin, Ye Ru
Bajaj, Kuljyot
Thomas, Sunil - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: There is currently no validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that is specific to nipple–areola complex (NAC) reconstruction. This paper evaluates all patient-reported outcomes for NAC reconstruction in the literature. Methods: Systematic literature searches of The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were conducted to identify all primary studies with patient-reported outcomes for NAC reconstruction. The primary outcome measures were patient satisfaction rates for appearance and symmetry of NAC reconstruction. Results: Fifty-nine papers were included in this review. Reported patient satisfaction was generally high, with the pooled average satisfaction rate for appearance being 81.9% and symmetry 80.3%. 89.5% of respondents would do it again and 94.8% would recommend it to others. There is no standardised or validated PROM specific to NAC reconstruction and this contributes to a lack of conclusive findings from studies in this area. Conclusion: There is a need for a validated PROM that is specific to NAC reconstruction, in order to serve as a standardised outcome assessment to guide further research and improve patient care. Highlights: Patient satisfaction with nipple reconstruction is generally high. There is no consensus on a gold standard technique for nipple reconstruction. A validated patient-reported outcome measure specific to nippleAbstract: Background: There is currently no validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that is specific to nipple–areola complex (NAC) reconstruction. This paper evaluates all patient-reported outcomes for NAC reconstruction in the literature. Methods: Systematic literature searches of The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform were conducted to identify all primary studies with patient-reported outcomes for NAC reconstruction. The primary outcome measures were patient satisfaction rates for appearance and symmetry of NAC reconstruction. Results: Fifty-nine papers were included in this review. Reported patient satisfaction was generally high, with the pooled average satisfaction rate for appearance being 81.9% and symmetry 80.3%. 89.5% of respondents would do it again and 94.8% would recommend it to others. There is no standardised or validated PROM specific to NAC reconstruction and this contributes to a lack of conclusive findings from studies in this area. Conclusion: There is a need for a validated PROM that is specific to NAC reconstruction, in order to serve as a standardised outcome assessment to guide further research and improve patient care. Highlights: Patient satisfaction with nipple reconstruction is generally high. There is no consensus on a gold standard technique for nipple reconstruction. A validated patient-reported outcome measure specific to nipple reconstruction is needed. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Surgeon. Volume 19:Issue 5(2021)
- Journal:
- Surgeon
- Issue:
- Volume 19:Issue 5(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 19, Issue 5 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0019-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- e245
- Page End:
- e255
- Publication Date:
- 2021-10
- Subjects:
- Nipple reconstruction -- Nipple–areola complex reconstruction -- Patient-reported outcomes -- PROM -- Patient satisfaction
Surgery -- Periodicals
Surgery -- Periodicals
Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals
617 - Journal URLs:
- http://bibpurl.oclc.org/web/5397 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/721359/description#description ↗
http://www.rcsed.ac.uk/journal/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/1479666X ↗
http://www.thesurgeon.net/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.surge.2020.11.005 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1479-666X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8548.120500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18907.xml