Risk versus recovery: Care planning with individuals on community treatment orders. (7th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dawson, Suzanne; Muir‐Cochrane, Eimear; Simpson, Alan; Lawn, Sharon
• Is Part Of: International journal of mental health nursing. Volume 30:Number 5(2021)
• Page Start: 1248
• Page End: 1262
• Publication Date: 2021-05-07
• Subjects: care planning -- community treatment orders -- mental health -- recovery -- risk; Psychiatric nursing -- Periodicals; 610.736805
• DOI: 10.1111/inm.12877
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1445-8330

Abstract

Abstract: Community treatment orders (CTOs) require individuals with a mental illness to accept treatment from mental health services. CTO legislation in South Australia states that treatment and care should be recovery‐focused, although justification for use is predominantly risk‐based, and care often coercive. Although CTOs are contested, individuals, families, and clinicians frequently engage in care planning within this context. This paper examines how the concepts of risk and risk management impact care planning from the perspectives of individuals on CTOs, their families, and clinicians. Ethnographic methods of observation and interview provided a detailed account of the perspectives of each group over an 18‐month period from two community mental health teams in South Australia. Findings show that care planning occurred within a culture of practice dominated by risk. Risk, however, was understood differently by each participant group, with the dominant narrative informed by biogenetic understandings of mental illness. This dominance impacted on the positioning of participant groups in care planning, focus of care contacts, and care options available. To improve care experiences and outcomes for individuals on CTOs, narrow conceptualizations of risk and recovery need to broaden to include an understanding of personal and social adversities individuals face. A broader understanding should reposition participants in the care planning context and rebalance care discussions, from a focus on clinical recovery to recovering citizenship.