E-032 Preoperative embolization of spetzler martin grade 3 arteriovenous malformations: a multi-center propensity adjusted analysis. (4th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Catapano, J; Frisoli, F; Nguyen, C; Wilkinson, D; Majmundar, N; Cole, T; Baranoski, J; Whiting, A; Kim, H; Spetzler, R; Ducruet, A; Albuquerque, F; Lawton, M
• Is Part Of: Journal of neurointerventional surgery. Volume 12(2020)Supplement 1
• Page Start: A44
• Page End: A44
• Publication Date: 2020-08-04
• Subjects: Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Cerebrovascular disease -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.48
• DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-SNIS.68
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1759-8478

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Spetzler Martin (SM) grade 3 arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are challenging lesions, often treated with preoperative embolization before definitive microsurgical resection. However, no significant difference in outcomes has been reported in patients with preoperative embolization for these lesions. Objective: To compare neurological outcomes of microsurgically treated SM grade 3 AVMs with vs without preoperative resection. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected AVM databases from two large tertiary centers for all microsurgically treated SM grade 3 AVMs during 2011–2018 was performed. Comparison of neurological outcome (modified Rankin Scale score [mRS] >2 and change in mRS on last follow-up) between patients with vs without preoperative embolization was performed. Results: Of 102 patients with microsurgically treated SM grade 3 AVMs, 57 (56%) underwent preoperative embolization. Significant differences between patients with vs without embolization were found for eloquence (75% vs 93%, p=0.02), diameter ≥3 cm (53% vs 27%, p=0.01), diffuseness (7% vs 22%, p=0.04), and mean follow-up mRS (1.1 vs 2.0, p=0.005). A higher percentage of patients without embolization (38%) than with embolization (7%) had an mRS >2 on follow-up (p<0.001). A propensity-adjusted analysis matching for age, supplemental grade, hemorrhage, diffuseness, deep drainage, diameter, eloquence, and location was performed, and no embolization (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–16; p=0.03) was a risk factor for an mRS score >2. Conclusion: Lack of preoperative embolization in SM grade 3 AVMs may be associated with increased risk of poor outcome following microsurgical resection. Hence, evaluation for preoperative embolization is essential for all intermediate-grade lesions. Disclosures: J. Catapano: None. F. Frisoli: None. C. Nguyen: None. D. Wilkinson: None. N. Majmundar: None. T. Cole: None. J. Baranoski: None. A. Whiting: None. H. Kim: None. R. Spetzler: None. A. Ducruet: None. F. Albuquerque: None. M. Lawton: None.