Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study. Issue 5 (22nd December 2018)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study. Issue 5 (22nd December 2018)
- Main Title:
- Should pretest genetic counselling be required for patients pursuing genomic sequencing? Results from a survey of participants in a large genomic implementation study
- Authors:
- Pacyna, Joel E
Radecki Breitkopf, Carmen
Jenkins, Sarah M
Sutton, Erica J
Horrow, Caroline
Kullo, Iftikhar J
Sharp, Richard R - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: We assessed the decision-making of individuals pursuing genomic sequencing without a requirement for pretest genetic counselling. We sought to describe the extent to which individuals who decline genetic counselling reported decisional conflict or struggled to make a decision to pursue genomic testing. Methods: We administered a 100-item survey to 3037 individuals who consented to the Return of Actionable Variants Empirical study, a genomic medicine implementation study supported by the National Institutes of Health (USA) eMERGE consortium. The primary outcomes of interest were self-reported decisional conflict about the decision to participate in the study and time required to reach a decision. Results: We received 2895 completed surveys (response rate=95.3%), and of these respondents 97.8% completed the decisional conflict scale in its entirety. A majority of individuals (63%) had minimal or no decisional conflict about the pursuit of genomic sequencing and were able to reach a decision quickly (78%). Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified several characteristics associated with decisional conflict, including lower education, lower health literacy, lower self-efficacy in coping, lack of prior experience with genetic testing, not discussing study participation with a family member or friend, and being male. Conclusion: As genomic sequencing is used more widely, genetic counselling resources may not be sufficient to meet demand. Our resultsAbstract : Purpose: We assessed the decision-making of individuals pursuing genomic sequencing without a requirement for pretest genetic counselling. We sought to describe the extent to which individuals who decline genetic counselling reported decisional conflict or struggled to make a decision to pursue genomic testing. Methods: We administered a 100-item survey to 3037 individuals who consented to the Return of Actionable Variants Empirical study, a genomic medicine implementation study supported by the National Institutes of Health (USA) eMERGE consortium. The primary outcomes of interest were self-reported decisional conflict about the decision to participate in the study and time required to reach a decision. Results: We received 2895 completed surveys (response rate=95.3%), and of these respondents 97.8% completed the decisional conflict scale in its entirety. A majority of individuals (63%) had minimal or no decisional conflict about the pursuit of genomic sequencing and were able to reach a decision quickly (78%). Multivariable logistic regression analyses identified several characteristics associated with decisional conflict, including lower education, lower health literacy, lower self-efficacy in coping, lack of prior experience with genetic testing, not discussing study participation with a family member or friend, and being male. Conclusion: As genomic sequencing is used more widely, genetic counselling resources may not be sufficient to meet demand. Our results challenge the notion that all individuals need genetic counselling in order to make an informed decision about genomic sequencing. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of medical genetics. Volume 56:Issue 5(2019)
- Journal:
- Journal of medical genetics
- Issue:
- Volume 56:Issue 5(2019)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 56, Issue 5 (2019)
- Year:
- 2019
- Volume:
- 56
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2019-0056-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- 317
- Page End:
- 324
- Publication Date:
- 2018-12-22
- Subjects:
- genetic counseling -- informed consent -- genomic implementation -- ELSI
Medical genetics -- Periodicals
616.042 - Journal URLs:
- http://jmg.bmjjournals.com/ ↗
http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105577 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1468-6244
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18898.xml