LL-06 Provider perceptions on the management of lupus during pregnancy: barriers to improved care. (August 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Clowse, Megan EB; Revels, Jessica; Eudy, Amanda; Schmidler-Sanders, Gillian; Neil, Laura; Gierisch, Jennifer
• Is Part Of: Lupus science & medicine. Volume 5(2018)Supplement 2
• Page Start: A69
• Page End: A69
• Publication Date: 2018-08
• Subjects: Systemic lupus erythematosus -- Periodicals; 616.772005
• DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2018-lsm.116
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-8851

Abstract

Abstract : Background: More than half of pregnancies in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (lupus) result in adverse outcomes for both mother and fetus. As demonstrated in the PROMISSE study, pregnancies managed by experts can have outcomes similar to the general population. However, many women with lupus do not receive this level of care and suffer complications at higher rates. We sought to identify aspects of current community rheumatologic care that could be improved to decrease the frequency of poor outcomes. Methods: Focus groups with clinical rheumatologists were held at state rheumatology conferences in North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and Northern California. The interview guide was based on the PRECEDE/PROCEED framework, seeking factors that predisposed, reinforced, and enabled physician practice patterns. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and coded to identify the elements of this framework. A group of women with lupus on their reproductive journey contributed to our understanding of the dilemmas and care provided. Results: Medically ill-timed pregnancies and medication non-adherence during pregnancy were identified by the rheumatologists as the 2 key dilemmas in care. We identified several communication gaps as a key modifiable barrier to optimal management: 1) the approach to physician/patient communication was often ill-suited to the sensitive discussion about pregnancy planning; 2) the communication of treatment plans was often hampered by gaps in knowledge and confidence in data, encouraging non-adherence among nervous patients; and 3) local rheumatologists and OB/GYN frequently did not communicate, leading to varying treatment plans and confusion for patients. The key predisposing factors that impaired care included gaps in knowledge and skills in discussing pregnancy planning and management, as well as clinic time for repeated discussions. Reinforcing factors that influenced care included local treatment factors and concerns over legal consequences. Factors that could enable improved care included access to an expert or guidelines, clinical reminders, and patient handouts. Conclusions: Our goal is to ensure that all women with lupus across the country receive expert-level care for pregnancy planning and management by elevating the care received from community rheumatologists. This study demonstrated the importance of communication skills, knowledge, and cohesive plans between community physicians in reaching this goal. We are currently developing HOP-STEP (Healthy Outcomes for Pregnancies in SLE Through Educating Providers and Patients), a multifaceted implementation project to enable women with lupus and their rheumatologists to have honest and accurate conversations about pregnancy planning and management. Acknowledgements: The Duke Autoimmunity in Pregnancy Patient Advisors and Collaborators contributed to this abstract.