Comparison of sample preparation methods for ChIP-chip assays. (November 2006)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: O'Geen, Henriette; Nicolet, Charles M.; Blahnik, Kim; Green, Roland; Farnham, Peggy J.
• Is Part Of: Biotechniques. Volume 41:Number 5(2006)
• Page Start: 577
• Page End: 580
• Publication Date: 2006-11
• Subjects: Biology, Experimental -- Periodicals; Molecular biology -- Periodicals; Medical technology -- Periodicals; Biology, Experimental; Medical technology; Molecular biology; Clinical Laboratory Techniques -- Periodicals; Research -- Periodicals; Medical Laboratory Science -- Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 570
• DOI: 10.2144/000112268
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0736-6205

Abstract

A single chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sample does not provide enough DNA for hybridization to a genomic tiling array. A commonly used technique for amplifying the DNA obtained from ChIP assays is ligation-mediated PCR (LM-PCR). However, using this amplification method, we could not identify Oct4 binding sites on genomic tiling arrays representing 1% of the human genome (ENCODE arrays). In contrast, hybridization of a pool of 10 ChIP samples to the arrays produced reproducible binding patterns and low background signals. However, the pooling method would greatly increase the number of ChIP reactions needed to analyze the entire human genome. Therefore, we have adapted the GenomePlex® whole genome amplification (WGA) method for use in ChIP-chip assays; detailed ChIP and amplification protocols used for these analyses are provided as supplementary material. When applied to ENCODE arrays, the products prepared using this new method resulted in an Oct4 binding pattern similar to that from the pooled Oct4 ChIP samples. Importantly, the signal-to-noise ratio using the GenomePlex WGA method is superior to the LM-PCR amplification method.