94 Simulation scenario beta-testing: increasing the fidelity. (17th November 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 94 Simulation scenario beta-testing: increasing the fidelity. (17th November 2016)
- Main Title:
- 94 Simulation scenario beta-testing: increasing the fidelity
- Authors:
- Sivakumar, C
Taylor, S
Meznikova, K
Ahmed, S
Makwana, S
Kadri, S
Gopal, A - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Undergraduate medical students from the Hull York Medical School are taught to use simulation 1 to create and run a high fidelity simulated scenario to teach their peer group about managing simple medical emergencies at Hull Institute of Learning and Simulation through a student-selected component. 2 An innovative fast feedback loop was used by students to create, test and improve the scenario over a short time period (akin to software beta-testing). The optimum number of cycles necessary to produce a scenario of strong fidelity and value to the learner was identified. Methodology: The scenario was tested on five occasions, each with a fresh participant. User feedback from post-scenario questionnaire quantitatively and qualitatively assessed educational value and fidelity to identify improvements for the scenario. This yielded a scenario independently assessed on day 5 to be of professional quality and value. Statistical analysis was performed on feedback questionnaires (Mann-Whitney U test), testing for gross global improvement across all numerical domains of the questionnaire (relevance, effectiveness and quality of the pre-brief, scenario and debrief) and comparing them between participants. Outcomes: There was a significant difference between the first(5.3 ± 0.7) and second cycle (8.7 ± 0.5) (p = 0.0002), between cycles 2–3 (9.7 ± 0.5) (p = 0.003) and 3–4 (8.2 ± 1.1) (p = 0.002). However, cycles 4–5 (8.7 ± 0.7) did not show a significant differenceAbstract : Background: Undergraduate medical students from the Hull York Medical School are taught to use simulation 1 to create and run a high fidelity simulated scenario to teach their peer group about managing simple medical emergencies at Hull Institute of Learning and Simulation through a student-selected component. 2 An innovative fast feedback loop was used by students to create, test and improve the scenario over a short time period (akin to software beta-testing). The optimum number of cycles necessary to produce a scenario of strong fidelity and value to the learner was identified. Methodology: The scenario was tested on five occasions, each with a fresh participant. User feedback from post-scenario questionnaire quantitatively and qualitatively assessed educational value and fidelity to identify improvements for the scenario. This yielded a scenario independently assessed on day 5 to be of professional quality and value. Statistical analysis was performed on feedback questionnaires (Mann-Whitney U test), testing for gross global improvement across all numerical domains of the questionnaire (relevance, effectiveness and quality of the pre-brief, scenario and debrief) and comparing them between participants. Outcomes: There was a significant difference between the first(5.3 ± 0.7) and second cycle (8.7 ± 0.5) (p = 0.0002), between cycles 2–3 (9.7 ± 0.5) (p = 0.003) and 3–4 (8.2 ± 1.1) (p = 0.002). However, cycles 4–5 (8.7 ± 0.7) did not show a significant difference in fidelity (p = 0.2). This and qualitative feedback suggests that three cycles are sufficient to achieve a sufficiently high level of fidelity and boost instructor competence. Conclusion: Scenario beta-testing is an excellent method of increasing scenario fidelity and providing high-yield tutor experience, especially if tutors are simulation-naive, and three cycles is suggested as an optimal. References: Gopal A, Purva M. A pilot of a simulation scenario scripting workshop for medical students: exposing students to teaching and learning using simulation-based medical education. BMJ STEL 2014;1 (Suppl 1):A1–A88. Fent G, Gopal A, Purva M. Simulation based medical education as a student selected component for medical students. BMJ STEL 2015;1 (Suppl 2):A1–A67. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning. Volume 2(2016)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning
- Issue:
- Volume 2(2016)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 2, Issue 1 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 2
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0002-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- A55
- Page End:
- A56
- Publication Date:
- 2016-11-17
- Subjects:
- Medicine -- Simulation methods -- Periodicals
Medical innovations -- Periodicals
610.113 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://stel.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjstel-2016-000158.145 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2056-6697
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18893.xml