Fully-staggered-array bulk Re-Ba-Cu-O short-period undulator: large-scale 3D electromagnetic modelling and design optimization using A-V and H-formulation methods. (18th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zhang, Kai; Ainslie, Mark; Calvi, Marco; Kinjo, Ryota; Schmidt, Thomas
• Is Part Of: Superconductor science & technology. Volume 34:Number 9(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-08-18
• Subjects: HTS modelling -- backward computation -- critical state model -- finite element method -- H-formulation -- bulk superconductors -- undulator; Superconductivity -- Periodicals; Superconductors -- Periodicals; 537.623
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6668/ac1c14
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0953-2048

Abstract

Abstract: The development of a new hard x- ray beamline I-TOMCAT equipped with a 1 m long short-period bulk high-temperature superconductor undulator (BHTSU) has been scheduled for the upgrade of the Swiss Light Source at the Paul Scherrer Institute. The very hard x -ray source generated by the BHTSU will increase the brilliance at the beamline by over one order of magnitude in comparison to other state-of-the-art undulator technologies and allow experiments to be carried out with photon energies in excess of 60 keV. One of the key challenges for designing a 1 m long (100 periods) BHTSU is the large-scale simulation of the magnetization currents inside 200 staggered-array bulk superconductors. A feasible approach to simplify the electromagnetic model is to retain five periods from both ends of the 1 m long BHTSU, reducing the number of degrees of freedom to the scale of millions. In this paper, the theory of the recently-proposed 2D A -V formulation-based backward computation method is extended to calculate the critical state magnetization currents in the ten-period staggered-array BHTSU in 3D. The simulation results of the magnetization currents and the associated undulator field along the electron beam axis are compared with the well-known 3D H -formulation and the highly efficient 3D H - ϕ formulation method, all methods showing excellent agreement with each other as well as with experimental results. The mixed H - ϕ formulation avoids computing the eddy currents in the air subdomain and is significantly faster than the full H -formulation method, but is slower in comparison to the A -V formulation-based backward computation. Finally, the fastest and the most efficient A -V formulation, implemented in ANSYS 2020R1 Academic, is adopted to optimize the integrals of the undulator field along the electron beam axis by optimizing the sizes of the end bulks.