How well do healthcare professionals know of the priorities of their older patients regarding treatment outcomes?. Issue 9 (September 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- How well do healthcare professionals know of the priorities of their older patients regarding treatment outcomes?. Issue 9 (September 2021)
- Main Title:
- How well do healthcare professionals know of the priorities of their older patients regarding treatment outcomes?
- Authors:
- Festen, Suzanne
Stegmann, Mariken E.
Prins, Annemiek
van Munster, Barbara C.
van Leeuwen, Barbara L.
Halmos, Gyorgy B.
de Graeff, Pauline
Brandenbarg, Daan - Abstract:
- Highlights: For shared decision making, it is crucial to identify patients' priorities. It was unknown whether healthcare professionals know their patients priorities. In our study healthcare professionals had poor knowledge of these priorities. Agreement was equally poor for general practitioners and medical specialists. Priorities should be explicitly discussed with patients. Abstract: Objectives: For shared decision making, it is crucial to identify patients' priorities regarding health outcomes. Our aim was to study whether healthcare professionals know these priorities. Methods: In this cross-sectional study we included older patients who had to make a treatment decision, their general practitioners (GPs) and their medical specialists. Agreement between the patients' main health outcome as prioritised by using the Outcome Prioritization Tool (OPT) and the perception of the same outcome by their healthcare professionals. Results: Eighty-seven patients were included. Median age was 76 years, 87.4% of patients presented with malignant disease. The majority prioritised maintaining independence (51.7%), followed by extending life (27.6%). The agreement between patients and healthcare professionals was low (GPs 41.7%, kappa 0.067, p = 0.39), medical specialists 40.3%, kappa 0.074, p = 0.33). Positively related to agreement was patient's age > 75, and a longer relation with their patients (for GPs), and the patient having no partner (for medical specialist). Having a malignantHighlights: For shared decision making, it is crucial to identify patients' priorities. It was unknown whether healthcare professionals know their patients priorities. In our study healthcare professionals had poor knowledge of these priorities. Agreement was equally poor for general practitioners and medical specialists. Priorities should be explicitly discussed with patients. Abstract: Objectives: For shared decision making, it is crucial to identify patients' priorities regarding health outcomes. Our aim was to study whether healthcare professionals know these priorities. Methods: In this cross-sectional study we included older patients who had to make a treatment decision, their general practitioners (GPs) and their medical specialists. Agreement between the patients' main health outcome as prioritised by using the Outcome Prioritization Tool (OPT) and the perception of the same outcome by their healthcare professionals. Results: Eighty-seven patients were included. Median age was 76 years, 87.4% of patients presented with malignant disease. The majority prioritised maintaining independence (51.7%), followed by extending life (27.6%). The agreement between patients and healthcare professionals was low (GPs 41.7%, kappa 0.067, p = 0.39), medical specialists 40.3%, kappa 0.074, p = 0.33). Positively related to agreement was patient's age > 75, and a longer relation with their patients (for GPs), and the patient having no partner (for medical specialist). Having a malignant disease, dependent living and functional deficits were negatively related to agreement. Conclusions: Healthcare professionals have poor perceptions of their patients' priorities. Practice implications: To realise patient-centered care, it is crucial to discuss priorities explicitly with all patients. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Patient education and counseling. Volume 104:Issue 9(2021)
- Journal:
- Patient education and counseling
- Issue:
- Volume 104:Issue 9(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 104, Issue 9 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 104
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0104-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 2358
- Page End:
- 2363
- Publication Date:
- 2021-09
- Subjects:
- Shared decision making -- Patient preferences -- Treatment goals -- Older patients -- Health outcome prioritization -- Primary care
Patient education -- Periodicals
Health counseling -- Periodicals
Health education -- Periodicals
Counseling -- Periodicals
Patient Education -- Periodicals
Éducation des patients -- Périodiques
Counseling -- Périodiques
Éducation sanitaire -- Périodiques
615.5071 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/07383991 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/07383991 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.pec.2021.02.044 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0738-3991
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6412.864600
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18881.xml