0120 Simethics: Teaching medical ethics through high-fidelity simulation. (2nd November 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 0120 Simethics: Teaching medical ethics through high-fidelity simulation. (2nd November 2015)
- Main Title:
- 0120 Simethics: Teaching medical ethics through high-fidelity simulation
- Authors:
- Collins, Sandra
Crowther, Nicola
McCabe, Anne
Natarajan, Michael
Jones, Kevin - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Effective management of clinical ethical issues has a significant impact on patients' experience and outcome. Our anonymous survey found that final year medical students have a confidence of 5.6 (10-point Likert scale) of the management of common clinical medical ethical issues. We have designed high-fidelity simulation teaching to teach about ethical principles and their practical application to patient cases. Methodology: We identified three common clinical ethical issues through focus group work with junior doctors. We designed three high-fidelity simulation scenarios to cover the issues. The scenarios were; (1) maintaining patient confidentiality when talking to relatives, (2) mental capacity assessment in a self-discharge case and (3) acting in a vulnerable patient's best interests. We delivered the three scenarios with detailed debriefs to five groups of final year medical students. Results: Thirty-three medical students provided feedback (n = 33) through an anonymous paper questionnaire. We collected qualitative and quantitative feedback via fre text boxes and 10-point Likert scales. Confidentiality: After the confidentiality scenario there was an improved awareness of 1.38/10 (p-value 0.0007) from 8.21 to 9.59. There was an improvement in confidence with management of 2.36/10 (p-value <0.0001) from 5.97 to 8.33. Capacity: This scenario showed an improved perceived relevance of 1.01/10 (p-value 0.0015) from 8.58 to 9.59. Student's confidenceAbstract : Background: Effective management of clinical ethical issues has a significant impact on patients' experience and outcome. Our anonymous survey found that final year medical students have a confidence of 5.6 (10-point Likert scale) of the management of common clinical medical ethical issues. We have designed high-fidelity simulation teaching to teach about ethical principles and their practical application to patient cases. Methodology: We identified three common clinical ethical issues through focus group work with junior doctors. We designed three high-fidelity simulation scenarios to cover the issues. The scenarios were; (1) maintaining patient confidentiality when talking to relatives, (2) mental capacity assessment in a self-discharge case and (3) acting in a vulnerable patient's best interests. We delivered the three scenarios with detailed debriefs to five groups of final year medical students. Results: Thirty-three medical students provided feedback (n = 33) through an anonymous paper questionnaire. We collected qualitative and quantitative feedback via fre text boxes and 10-point Likert scales. Confidentiality: After the confidentiality scenario there was an improved awareness of 1.38/10 (p-value 0.0007) from 8.21 to 9.59. There was an improvement in confidence with management of 2.36/10 (p-value <0.0001) from 5.97 to 8.33. Capacity: This scenario showed an improved perceived relevance of 1.01/10 (p-value 0.0015) from 8.58 to 9.59. Student's confidence with management improved by 1.94/10 (p-value < 0.0001) from 6.70 to 8.64. Best interests: Students reported an improved awareness of 1.03/10 (p-value < 0.0052) from 8.58 to 9.61. The student's confidence with management improved by 2.30/10 (p-value < 0.0001) from 5.97 to 8.27. Students commented in the feedback that there was a 'massive difference to learning in real time than textbook' and it made the ethics teaching 'much more fun and more memorable.' Recommendations: We hope to expand this teaching to students within other healthcare professions and postgraduate healthcare professionals. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning. Volume 1(2015)Supplement 2
- Journal:
- BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning
- Issue:
- Volume 1(2015)Supplement 2
- Issue Display:
- Volume 1, Issue 2 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 1
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0001-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- A11
- Page End:
- A11
- Publication Date:
- 2015-11-02
- Subjects:
- Medicine -- Simulation methods -- Periodicals
Medical innovations -- Periodicals
610.113 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://stel.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjstel-2015-000075.26 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2056-6697
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18872.xml