10–2 Improving quality of chest compressions amongst medical and nursing staff through deliberate in-situ simulated practice with feedback: the impact of repeated training. (17th November 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- 10–2 Improving quality of chest compressions amongst medical and nursing staff through deliberate in-situ simulated practice with feedback: the impact of repeated training. (17th November 2017)
- Main Title:
- 10–2 Improving quality of chest compressions amongst medical and nursing staff through deliberate in-situ simulated practice with feedback: the impact of repeated training
- Authors:
- Korb, C
Lofton, L
Balnta, C
MacGloin, H
Goodliffe, K
Buckle, C
McGee, J
Lane, M
Burmester, M - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Quality of chest compressions underpins resuscitation outcomes with poorer performance leading to lower survival rates. 1 We aimed to analyse whether deliberate practice of chest compressions with real-time feedback improves quality of compression amongst PICU nursing and medical staff and the impact of repeated training at 2, 4 and 6 months. Methods: Prospective, longitudinal study with in-situ workshops utilising Resusci Baby® QCPR®. Hand position, correct & average rate, depth and recoil were recorded and resulted in overall summative scores. Study protocol and consent procedure were approved by the Trusts Research Office. Results: 56 participants (14 doctors, 42 nurses) of which 49 (87.5%) completed all workshops. There was significant improvement on overall, depth, recoil and rate scores immediately after feedback for all workshops (Table 1). A significant improvement was also noted on baseline scores over time: complete recoil from 2nd session (72%, IQR 20–98% vs. 98%, IQR 82–100%, p=0.003); overall score, depth, correct and average rate at 4 months in comparison to the first session (84%, IQR 49–94% vs. 95%, IQR 87–98%, p<0.001; 97%, IQR 45–100% vs. 100%, IQR 98–100%, p<0.001; 14%, IQR 1–83% vs. 65%, IQR 30–90%, p=0.002; 119bpm, IQR 113–129bpm vs. 112bpm, IQR 101–118bpm, p=0.01, respectively). Hand position baseline scores did not significantly change over time. Conclusion: Deliberate practice of chest compressions with continuous real-timeAbstract : Background: Quality of chest compressions underpins resuscitation outcomes with poorer performance leading to lower survival rates. 1 We aimed to analyse whether deliberate practice of chest compressions with real-time feedback improves quality of compression amongst PICU nursing and medical staff and the impact of repeated training at 2, 4 and 6 months. Methods: Prospective, longitudinal study with in-situ workshops utilising Resusci Baby® QCPR®. Hand position, correct & average rate, depth and recoil were recorded and resulted in overall summative scores. Study protocol and consent procedure were approved by the Trusts Research Office. Results: 56 participants (14 doctors, 42 nurses) of which 49 (87.5%) completed all workshops. There was significant improvement on overall, depth, recoil and rate scores immediately after feedback for all workshops (Table 1). A significant improvement was also noted on baseline scores over time: complete recoil from 2nd session (72%, IQR 20–98% vs. 98%, IQR 82–100%, p=0.003); overall score, depth, correct and average rate at 4 months in comparison to the first session (84%, IQR 49–94% vs. 95%, IQR 87–98%, p<0.001; 97%, IQR 45–100% vs. 100%, IQR 98–100%, p<0.001; 14%, IQR 1–83% vs. 65%, IQR 30–90%, p=0.002; 119bpm, IQR 113–129bpm vs. 112bpm, IQR 101–118bpm, p=0.01, respectively). Hand position baseline scores did not significantly change over time. Conclusion: Deliberate practice of chest compressions with continuous real-time feedback improves quality of compressions amongst PICU nursing and medical staff. This improvement is noted immediately and continues over time with repeated training. Reference: D Yannopoulos, TP Aufderheide, BS Abella, et al . Quality of CPR: An important effect modifier in cardiac arrest clinical outcomes and intervention effectiveness trials. Resuscitation 2015;94:106–13. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning. Volume 3(2017)Supplement 3
- Journal:
- BMJ simulation & technology enhanced learning
- Issue:
- Volume 3(2017)Supplement 3
- Issue Display:
- Volume 3, Issue 3 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 3
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0003-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- A1
- Page End:
- A1
- Publication Date:
- 2017-11-17
- Subjects:
- Medicine -- Simulation methods -- Periodicals
Medical innovations -- Periodicals
610.113 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://stel.bmj.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjstel-2017-demec.1 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2056-6697
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 18861.xml