CO-MORBIDITY BURDEN IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE AND MATCHED CONTROLS. Issue 11 (14th October 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Goddard, Hannah; Macleod, Angus; Counsell, Carl
• Is Part Of: Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry. Volume 86:Issue 11(2015)
• Page Start: e4
• Page End: e4
• Publication Date: 2015-10-14
• Subjects: Neurology -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Psychiatry -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-312379.176
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-3050

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common, disabling, neurodegenerative disorder. The overall co-morbidity burden associated with PD is unclear, but may be important to adjust for when predicting prognosis or comparing cases and controls. Aims: ▸ To determine how best to assess overall co-morbidity in PD ▸ To compare PD co-morbidity burden to that of age- and sex-matched controls Methods: Data from an incident, community-based cohort of 205 patients with PD and 148 age-, sex- and GP-matched controls (the PINE study) were used. The intra- and inter-rater reliability and mortality predictive ability of three co-morbidity scales (the Charlson Co-Morbidity Index, the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale and a disease count) were evaluated. The co-morbidity burden of cases and controls was compared at baseline and over 5 years of follow-up. Results and conclusions: The Charlson Co-Morbidity Index was more reliable for use in PD and was the only scale that was independently predictive of mortality (hazard ratio=1.20, [95% CI 1.07–1.34]). There was no significant difference between cases and controls at baseline (p=0.20). Charlson Co-Morbidity Index scores increased over time. This increase was greater in patients with PD than controls and greater in patients and controls who died earlier.