Inpatient management of diabetes: survey in a tertiary care centre. Issue 936 (11th November 2003)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Deepak, P J; Sunitha, K; Nagaraj, J; Sanjukta, A; Bhattacharyya, A
• Is Part Of: Postgraduate medical journal. Volume 79:Issue 936(2003)
• Page Start: 585
• Page End: 587
• Publication Date: 2003-11-11
• Subjects: inpatient management -- diabetes mellitus; HbA1C, glycated haemoglobin -- NKHC, non-ketotic hyperosmolar coma; Medicine -- Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.1136/pmj.79.936.585
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0032-5473

Abstract

Abstract : Aims: Good glycaemic control in hospitalised patients with diabetes mellitus improves wellbeing and aids recovery. This survey aimed to: (1) assess glycaemic control in patients with diabetes admitted to hospital for reasons other than diabetes, (2) compare the glycaemic control in patients treated in medical and surgical units, and (3) see the impact of specialists' input on glycaemic control. Methods: The first 150 patients admitted to hospital were identified; those with acute metabolic complications of diabetes mellitus, acute myocardial infarction, pregestational or gestational diabetes, and patients in different intensive care units were excluded. Case notes were reviewed with particular attention to glycaemic control, frequency of blood monitoring, complications, and the actions taken to improve glycaemic control. Results: Four of the 150 patients died in hospital. When subcutaneous insulin was used glycaemic control was good in 48%, suboptimal in 15%, and poor in 37% of patients. The results were not significantly different with subcutaneous or intravenous insulin. There was also no difference in glycaemic control among medical and surgical patients. Patients managed by designated specialists had better control than those managed by physicians (p<0.001). Hypoglycaemia was documented in 20% and two patients developed non-ketotic hyperosmolar coma while in hospital. In a few cases treatment at discharge was not changed despite poor control while in hospital. Conclusion: More attention should be given to improving glycaemic control in patients hospitalised for reasons other than diabetes. Particular care should be taken to modify the dose of insulin needed to get good glycaemic control; control was better with specialists' input. A follow up survey will be conducted.