Public stigma towards informal caregiving in Germany: a descriptive study. (3rd August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Zwar, L.; Angermeyer, M. C.; Matschinger, H.; Riedel-Heller, S. G.; König, H.-H.; Hajek, A.
• Is Part Of: Aging & mental health. Volume 25:Number 8(2021)
• Page Start: 1515
• Page End: 1524
• Publication Date: 2021-08-03
• Subjects: Stigma -- informal care -- caregiver -- social distance; Older people -- Mental health -- Periodicals; Geriatric psychiatry -- Periodicals; Older people -- Psychology -- Periodicals; Aging -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Aged -- psychology -- periodicals; Mental Health -- periodicals; Mental Health Services -- periodicals; Aging -- psychology -- periodicals; Aged, 80 and over -- psychology -- periodicals; 618.97689
• DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1758913
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1360-7863

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: This study aims to investigate the public stigma towards informal caregivers of individuals aged 65 years and older in the German population. Method: In an Online-Survey 1038 participants (18 years and older and living in Germany) were sampled using a quota-system based on the German micro census data. To assess public stigma towards informal caregiving for individuals aged 65 years and older, three aspects of stigma were assessed: 1) emotional reactions (adapted Emotional Reaction to Mental Illness Scale), 2) behavioral reactions (adapted Social Distance Scale), and 3) cognitive reactions (newly developed List of Cognitions regarding informal caregiving). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted for the development and adaptation of the three instruments, and their composite reliability is provided. Results: Emotional reactions in terms of devaluing feelings and feelings of misery were low, while appreciative feelings were neither low nor high. Reported social distance was low. Agreement with cognitions towards informal care in terms of devaluing and accusative cognitions was on average low, but high regarding appreciative cognitions. Conclusion: The results show that there is stigma towards informal caregiving for older individuals (65 years and older) in terms of emotional reactions, cognitions and social distance, although the magnitude of this stigma seems to be small. Knowledge regarding the occurrence and magnitude of stigma, as well as the processes that underlie this, is needed to prevent stigmatization and its negative outcomes, or at the very least, to enable the development of support for the affected individuals.