'Take Ten' improving the surgical post-take ward round: a quality improvement project. Issue 1 (1st March 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Banfield, Danielle Alice; Adamson, Carly; Tomsett, Amy; Povey, James; Fordham, Tony; Richards, Sarah Kathryn
• Is Part Of: BMJ open quality. Volume 7:Issue 1(2018)
• Publication Date: 2018-03-01
• Subjects: patient safety -- quality improvement -- checklists -- surgery -- teams; Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals; 362.106805
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000045
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2399-6641

Abstract

Abstract : Background: The surgical post-take ward round is a complex multidisciplinary interaction in which new surgical patients are reviewed and management plans formulated. Its fast-paced nature can lead to poor communication and inaccurate or incomplete documentation with potential detriment to patient safety. Junior team members often do not fully understand the diagnosis and management plan. Aims: The aims of this project were to improve both communication and documentation on the surgical post-take ward round, influencing patient safety. Methods: The ward round was deconstructed to identify individual roles and determine where intervention would have the most impact. Ten important points were identified that should be documented in the management of an acute surgical patient; observations, examination, impression, investigations, antibiotics, intravenous fluids, VTE assessment, nutrition status, estimated length of stay and ceiling of treatment. A 'Take Ten' checklist was devised with these items to be used as a 'time out' after each patient with the whole team for discussion, clarification and clear documentation. Four plan do study act cycles were completed over a period of a year. A retrospective review of post-take documentation preintervention and postintervention was performed, and the percentage of points that were accurately documented was calculated. For further clarification, 2 weekends were compared—one where the checklist was used and one where it was not. Results: Results showed documentation postintervention varied between categories but there was improvement in documentation of VTE assessment, fluids, observations and investigations. On direct comparison of weekends the checklist showed improved documentation in all categories except length of stay. Junior team members found the checklist improved understanding of diagnosis and management plan, and encouraged a more effective ward round. Conclusion: The 'Take Ten' checklist has been well received. Three years on from its inception, the checklist has become an integral part of the post-take ward round, thanks to the multidisciplinary engagement in the project.