Array-based comparative genomic hybridisation identifies high frequency of cryptic chromosomal rearrangements in patients with syndromic autism spectrum disorders. Issue 11 (13th July 2006)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jacquemont, M-L; Sanlaville, D; Redon, R; Raoul, O; Cormier-Daire, V; Lyonnet, S; Amiel, J; Le Merrer, M; Heron, D; de Blois, M-C; Prieur, M; Vekemans, M; Carter, N P; Munnich, A; Colleaux, L; Philippe, A
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical genetics. Volume 43:Issue 11(2006)
• Page Start: 843
• Page End: 849
• Publication Date: 2006-07-13
• Subjects: array-CGH, array-based CGH -- ASD, autism spectrum disorders -- CGH, comparative genomic hybridisation -- DSM IV, Diagnostic Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders—fourth edition -- FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation -- PDD, pervasive developmental disorder -- PDD—NOS, PDD—not otherwise specified; Medical genetics -- Periodicals; 616.042
• DOI: 10.1136/jmg.2006.043166
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1468-6244

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) refer to a broader group of neurobiological conditions, pervasive developmental disorders. They are characterised by a symptomatic triad associated with qualitative changes in social interactions, defect in communication abilities, and repetitive and stereotyped interests and activities. ASD is prevalent in 1 to 3 per 1000 people. Despite several arguments for a strong genetic contribution, the molecular basis of a most cases remains unexplained. About 5% of patients with autism have a chromosome abnormality visible with cytogenetic methods. The most frequent are 15q11–q13 duplication, 2q37 and 22q13.3 deletions. Many other chromosomal imbalances have been described. However, most of them remain undetectable using routine karyotype analysis, thus impeding diagnosis and genetic counselling. Methods and results: 29 patients presenting with syndromic ASD were investigated using a DNA microarray constructed from large insert clones spaced at approximately 1 Mb intervals across the genome. Eight clinically relevant rearrangements were identified in 8 (27.5%) patients: six deletions and two duplications. Altered segments ranged in size from 1.4 to 16 Mb (2–19 clones). No recurrent abnormality was identified. Conclusion: These results clearly show that array comparative genomic hybridisation should be considered to be an essential aspect of the genetic analysis of patients with syndromic ASD. Moreover, besides their importance for diagnosis and genetic counselling, they may allow the delineation of new contiguous gene syndromes associated with ASD. Finally, the detailed molecular analysis of the rearranged regions may pave the way for the identification of new ASD genes.